Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) K.A. Bollen , F. Chen , P. Paxton , James B. Kirby , Patrick J. Curran
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Ohio State University, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
ANO 2001
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Sociological Methods and Research
ISSN 0049-1241
E-ISSN 1552-8294
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/0049124101029004003
CITAÇÕES 10
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 2df79f9560e90bffaf5ba1e941ea6a71

Resumo

In this article, the authors examine the most common type of improper solutions: zero or negative error variances. They address the causes of, consequences of, and strategies to handle these issues. Several hypotheses are evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation models, including two structural equation models with several misspecifications of each model. Results suggested several unique findings. First, increasing numbers of omitted paths in the measurement model were associated with decreasing numbers of improper solutions. Second, bias in the parameter estimates was higher in samples with improper solutions than in samples including only proper solutions. Third, investigations of the consequences of using constrained estimates in the presence of improper solutions indicated that inequality constraints helped some samples achieve convergence. Finally, the use of confidence intervals as well as four other proposed tests yielded similar results when testing whether the error variance was greater than or equal to zero.

Ferramentas