Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) D.J. Harding , S. L. Morgan
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations
ANO 2006
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Sociological Methods and Research
ISSN 0049-1241
E-ISSN 1552-8294
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/0049124106289164
CITAÇÕES 44
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 651ae575becba6942f5272a8edf891a1

Resumo

As the counterfactual model of causality has increased in popularity, sociologists have returned to matching as a research methodology. In this article, advances over the past two decades in matching estimators are explained, and the practical limitations of matching techniques are emphasized. The authors introduce matching methods by focusing first on ideal scenarios in which stratification and weighting procedures warrant causal inference. Then, they discuss how matching is often undertaken in practice, offering an overview of the most prominent data analysis routines. With four hypothetical examples, they demonstrate how the assumptions behind matching estimators often break down in practice. Even so, the authors argue that matching techniques can be used effectively to strengthen the prosecution of causal questions in sociology.

Ferramentas