Finding Ashmounds
Identifying Large Buried Homogenous Anthropogenic Features with ERT
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23308488 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Austin C Hill (0000-0002-8397-8105, California University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author), Mark T Lycett (0000-0002-0662-0126, California University of Pennsylvania), Jennifer T Feng (0000-0002-0069-7886, California University of Pennsylvania), Moriah Mckenna (0009-0003-2299-7905, California University of Pennsylvania), Smriti Haricharan (0009-0003-6399-5703, Indian Institute of Technology), K D Morrison (0000-0002-8224-0846, California University of Pennsylvania) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-12 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Antiquity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7316 • E-ISSN: 2325-5064 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/aaq.2026.10194 |
| OpenAlex | W7170629813 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 21 |
Electrical Resistance Tomography (ERT) is commonly used in geophysical and environmental surveys because it allows for rapid and high-quality resolution of large depositional features over a wide area. It is generally less able to resolve small anthropogenic features, however, so it has had a slower uptake among archaeologists despite several promising applications over the last two decades. Traditional soil resistivity (ER) surveys are generally limited to two-dimensional surveys at a given depth based on the probe spacing and array selected. As an extension of our ongoing work using ER to detect shallow but spatially extensive patterns at a large urban site of Brahmagiri in southern India, we experimented with using our Frobisher Tar-3 resistance meter to create a “pseudosection”—a narrow but deep remotely sensed profile of a Neolithic ashmound. Ashmounds are large accumulations of vitrified cattle dung, and as such, are appropriate targets for ERT. In our ongoing work at Brahmagiri, one of the most well-known sites in southern India, we located no fewer than nine ashmounds covering an area of more than 10 ha. First reported here, these features add significantly to our understanding of the South Indian Neolithic. Given the size, distribution, and depositional context of the ashmounds, ERT appears to be a promising method for studying these important features.
Context (archaeology) · Electrical Resistivity Tomography · High resolution · Resistance (ecology) · Sedimentary depositional environment · Geology and Paleoclimatology Research · Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Seeing Beneath the Soil
Detecting Trends in the Prediction of the Buried Past
Prehistoric settlement developments in the multi-period sites of south India, Brahmagiri Hill
Landscape, monumental architecture, and ritual
Deep subsurface geophysical prospection at Tell Qarqur, Syria
Discovery of a Byzantine Church in Iznik/Nicaea, Turkey
Ground‐penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography studies in the biblical Pisidian Antioch city, southwest Anatolia
Evidence of Neolithic Cattle-Penning at Budihal, Gulbarga District, Karnataka
On Putting Time in its Place
Landscape and Cosmology in the South Indian Neolithic
A Preliminary study on the Ashmound sites in the Lower Tungabhadra Region of Andhra Pradesh
Dating the Neolithic of South India
Geophysical Surveys as Landscape Archaeology
Archaeology and Coloniality in South Asia
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |