Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exploring the Limits of iCS in Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

A Randomized Controlled Trial

Bibliographic Data

ID23308659
AuthorsSusana I Justo‐Henriques (Instituto Politécnico de Beja), Susana I Justo-Henriques (Instituto Politécnico de Beja), Rosa C Gomes Silva (Universidade do Porto), Isabel Gómez‐Soria (0000-0002-0061-3312, Universidad de Zaragoza), Ricardo M V de São João (Instituto Politécnico de Santarém), Oscar Ribeiro (0000-0001-7396-639X, University of Aveiro)
Year2026
Publication date2026-07-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJapanese Psychological Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-5368 • E-ISSN: 1468-5884
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jpr.70041
OpenAlexW7172044353
LanguageEN
References cited62

Alzheimer's disease (AD) involves deficits in multiple cognitive domains, particularly memory and executive function. This study explored the effectiveness of an individual cognitive stimulation program in older adults with moderate AD. A multicenter, parallel, two‐arm, single‐blind randomized controlled trial was conducted with 80 older adults. Participants were randomly assigned to either the individual cognitive stimulation group ( n = 39, 24 sessions, twice a week for 12 weeks) or the treatment‐as‐usual group ( n = 41). Cognitive outcomes—global cognition, memory, and executive function—were assessed at baseline, post‐intervention, and at 12‐week follow‐up. Analyses were conducted using linear mixed‐effects models under an intention‐to‐treat framework, complemented by repeated‐measures analysis of variance. Results showed a significant Group × Time interaction for free recall memory and for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale—Cognitive Subscale “recall of test instructions,” with a marginal interaction for “comprehension of spoken language.” However, no significant between‐group differences were observed at any time point. No other significant between‐group differences over time were found using linear mixed‐effects models or repeated‐measures analysis of variance. Although some benefits were identified, the reduced responsiveness in more advanced AD stages highlights the challenges of cognitive intervention at this phase.

Affect (linguistics) · Cognition · Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance · Free recall · Intervention (counseling) · Memory test · Randomized controlled trial · Recall · Test (biology) · Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Traumatic Brain Injury Research

  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

    American Psychiatric Association American Psychiatric Association, American…•Diagnostic and Statistical Manual…•2022

  • Consort 2010 Statement

    Open Access•the CONSORT Group, Kenneth F Schulz et al.•BMC Medicine•2010

  • The FAB

    Open Access•B Dubois, A Slachevsky et al.•Neurology•2000

  • Whitepaper

    Open Access•Yarden Stern, Yaakov Stern et al.•Alzheimer's & Dementia•2020

  • Working memory

    Open Access•Alan Baddeley•Current Biology•2010

  • Chapter 20 What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?

    Nelson Cowan•Essence of memory•2008

  • “Mini-mental state”

    Open Access•Marshal F Folstein, Susan E Folstein et al.•Journal of Psychiatric Research•1975

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae