Peirce, Abduction, and Inverse Problems in the Geosciences
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23308771 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alisa Bokulich (0000-0002-9406-3904, Boston University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-19 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-23 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy of Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0031-8248 • E-ISSN: 1539-767X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/psa.2026.10263 |
| OpenAlex | W7170164131 |
| Language | EN |
Charles Peirce’s most well-known contribution to logic and scientific methodology is his account of abduction . However, what exactly Peirce meant by abduction is subject to perennial dispute. My aim in this paper is two-fold: First, I interpret Peirce’s abduction through the lens of his research in geophysics and argue this supports interpreting it as a kind of inverse modeling. Second, I show that the methods Peirce outlined for managing the underdetermination of abductive inferences are the same as those deployed by geoscientists to manage the nonuniqueness of geophysical inversions. I conclude by emphasizing the value of reintegrating Peirce-the-Philosopher with Peirce-the-Geoscientist.
Calculus (dental) · Inverse problem · Subject (documents) · Underdetermination · Value (mathematics) · History of Science and Natural History · Origins and Evolution of Life · Philosophy and History of Science
| Highly cited | No |
|---|