Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Vincent Arel-Bundock
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada
ANO 2022
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Sociological Methods and Research
ISSN 0049-1241
E-ISSN 1552-8294
EDITORA SAGE Publications
DOI 10.1177/0049124119882460
CITAÇÕES 2
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 f75da6404846193f17e045c4378d08e4

Resumo

Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is an influential methodological approach motivated by set theory and boolean logic. QCA proponents have developed algorithms to analyze quantitative data, in a bid to uncover necessary and sufficient conditions where causal relationships are complex, conditional, or asymmetric. This article uses computer simulations to show that researchers in the QCA tradition face a vexing double bind. On the one hand, QCA algorithms often require large data sets in order to recover an accurate causal model, even if that model is relatively simple. On the other hand, as data sets increase in size, it becomes harder to guarantee data integrity, and QCA algorithms can be highly sensitive to measurement error, data entry mistakes, or misclassification.

Ferramentas