Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sympoietic creativity and the boundaries of qing

Digital romance writers negotiating generative AI

Bibliographic Data

ID23310044
AuthorsLonglong Ge (0000-0003-1519-455X, University of Manchester, corresponding author), Liang Ge (0000-0001-7619-1278)
Year2026
Publication date2026-07-24
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAI & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0951-5666 • E-ISSN: 1435-5655
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s00146-026-03253-w
OpenAlexW7170604446
LanguageEN
References cited24

This study investigates how writers of high-velocity Chinese digital romance fiction negotiate the arrival of generative AI at the desk. Drawing on a 4-year multi-sited digital ethnography (2021–2025) and interviews with 34 writers on Jinjiang Literature City alongside sustained forum observation and platform-discourse analysis, this article tracks how authors of serial romance work under the time discipline of the daily-update treadmill in the presence of large language models (LLMs). I argue that what is emerging is sympoietic creativity: a distributed practice of “making-with” the machine that is fraught, ambivalent and strategic rather than collaborative or replacement-driven. Four modes of negotiation co-exist across the cohort. In strategic collaboration , writers delegate world-building, naming and structural error-checking to the LLM. In cyborg authorship , they curate machine-generated prose under acute platform pressure, at the cost of what they themselves call the work’s “aura.” In conditional refusal , they hold the line at the inter-subjective texture of feeling they consider, on present evidence, beyond the model’s competence. In narrative incorporation , they thematize algorithmic logic in the fiction itself, casting the algorithmic system as villain and human emotion as the route to victory. Throughout, I reserve qing —the inter-subjective, somatic bond from which affect, desire, and embodiment become legible to the reader—as a precise analytical term distinct from generic English-language emotion or affect. The human zone these writers preserve is not a permanent or guaranteed space, but an unstable equilibrium sustained by reader vigilance, platform metrics, and writer self-discipline—any of which could withdraw.

Creativity · Digital media · Ethnography · Generative grammar · Narrative · Negotiation · Online and offline · Performativity · Romance · Artistic and Creative Research · Digital Humanities and Scholarship · Narrative Theory and Analysis

  • Dependent, Distracted, Bored

    Paasonen, Susanna Paasonen•Dependent, Distracted, Bored•2021

  • Networking China

    Yu Hong•Networking China•2017

  • The Spatiality of Emotion in Early Modern China

    Ling Hon Lam•Spatiality of Emotion in Early…•2018

  • Chinese Creator Economies

    Jian Lin•Chinese Creator Economies•2023

  • (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love

    Brooke Erin Duffy, Brendan Duffy•(Not) getting paid to do what you…•2017

  • Spectral imaginings and sympoietic creativity

    Open Access•Longlong Ge•Big Data & Society•2025

  • The algorithmic imaginary

    Taina Bucher•Information Communication & Society•2017

  • Enchantment and Disenchantment

    Wai-Yee Li•Enchantment and Disenchantment•1993

  • Feminism, Labour and Digital Media

    Kylie Jarrett•Feminism, Labour and Digital Media•2015

  • Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis

    Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Sport and…•2019

  • Writing on the assembly line

    Open Access•Elaine Jing Zhao•New Media & Society•2016

  • The romance of work

    Open Access•Brendan Duffy•International Journal of Cultural…•2015

  • Ambivalent affective labor

    Open Access•Longlong Ge•European Journal of Cultural…•2024

  • Platformize Asia-Reimagining Asia in Platform Capitalism

    Open Access•Lin Zhang, Jingyan Elaine Yuan•Social Media + Society•2025

  • Parables for the Virtual

    Open Access•B Massumi, Stanley Fish et al.•Parables for the Virtual•2002

  • Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives d'émancipation

    Antoinette Rouvroy, Thomas Berns et al.•Réseaux•2013

  • Situated Knowledges

    Donna Haraway•Feminist Studies•1988

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae