Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Historicising Indigenous Political Thought

The Location of Sovereignty

Bibliographic Data

ID23310296
AuthorsT Rowse (0000-0003-3602-5966, Western Sydney University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages1-21
Publication date2026-07-23
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Historical Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1031-461X • E-ISSN: 1940-5049
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1031461x.2026.2695836
OpenAlexW7170144551
LanguageEN

Writing about Indigenous sovereignty says much about how settler colonial governance affects Indigenous sovereignty practices, but less about the relationships among Indigenous Australians themselves. If Indigenous practices of sovereignty are ‘autonomous', they are difficult to observe and historicise. However, we can examine the self-positioning remarks of Indigenous political actors, and we can read relevant ethnography. This paper highlights self-positioning remarks by William Cooper (1861-1941) and Neville Bonner (1922-1999). It then uses ethnography to contextualise a report by Lowitja O’Donoghue (1932-2024). Indigenous political thought is about both the internal order of the Australian states and changes in the Indigenous domain.

Indigenous · Politics · Sovereignty · State (computer science) · Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae