Networked Counterpublics and Contentious Publicity
A Cross-Platform Analysis of QAnon on Parler and Twitter
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23310366 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sang Jung Kim (0000-0001-5861-728X, University of Iowa, corresponding author), Jordan Foley (0000-0003-0719-8315, Washington State University), A J Bauer (0000-0001-8458-2586, Mitchell Institute), Keyeun Lee (0009-0001-2794-5712, Seoul National University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-25 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Political Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1058-4609 • E-ISSN: 1091-7675 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10584609.2026.2708132 |
| OpenAlex | W7171506119 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
Extremist online movements often leverage social media affordances to shape in-group identity and influence broader publics through agenda-setting practices. This study uses QAnon as a case of a networked counterpublic to examine how these processes unfolded between 2018 and 2021. Drawing on affordance theory, we analyze how QAnon discourse activated the affordances of visibility, association, and persistence on Parler and Twitter – two platforms similar in technical features but distinct in their cultures of use. We identify differentiated affordance-activation practices that support different counterpublic functions: for example, hashtag stacking on Parler can be interpreted as contributing to identity-oriented meaning-making, whereas calls to “do your own research” on Twitter may function as epistemic invitations aimed at drawing mainstream users into conspiratorial interpretation. We further show that QAnon’s contentious publicness – the contestation of pro- and anti-QAnon claims – shifted dynamically across the movement’s developmental stages, and that identical informational resources (shared URLs) generated divergent discursive trajectories across platforms. By tracing these temporal and cross-platform dynamics, we illuminate how extremist counterpublics navigate visibility, identity work, and public contestation, offering insights for the study of political communication in an era of networked extremism.
Affordance · Discourse analysis · Identity (music) · Leverage (statistics) · Mainstream · Politics · Publics · Social media · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Social Media and Politics · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Modulating moderation
Inequities of race, place, and gender among the communication citation elite, 2000–2019
Whose stories are told and who is made responsible? Human-interest framing in health journalism in Norway, Spain, the U.K. and the U.S
When the Personal Becomes Political
Protest leadership in the age of social media
Funeral and Instagram
Plots, Designs, and Schemes
Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis
Defining affordances in social media research
Tracing normiefication
Social Media Use in Organizations
Twittering the News
How a peripheral ideology becomes mainstream
Constructing alternative facts
Explicating Affordances
Seeking the "Counter," in Counterpublics
From Counterpublics to Contentious Publicness
Recentering power
Legitimating a platform
Mere Description
Where We Produce One, We Produce All
Ferguson is everywhere
Rethinking the Public Sphere
Publics and Counterpublics
Pandemic Protesters on Telegram
Technologies, Texts and Affordances
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |