At the shift
Norwegian abortion providers between policy and practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23310684 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lotta Maria Vilhelmiina Linjala (University of Oslo, corresponding author), Anna Solveig Kolz (University of Oslo), Marte Emilie Sandvik Haaland (0000-0001-8253-2841, University of Bergen), Carolina Rau Steuernagel (0000-0001-5277-3994, University of Oslo) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-12 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Culture Health & Sexuality (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-1058 • E-ISSN: 1464-5351 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13691058.2026.2698829 |
| PMID | 42497007 |
| OpenAlex | W7170964327 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 45 |
This study investigated abortion providers' experiences during Norway's recent regulatory transition extending the time allowed for self-determined abortion from 12 to 18 weeks. Through semi-structured interviews with 12 healthcare professionals, we captured abortion care providers' views on their work and expectations about the regulatory shift. Despite finding abortion care meaningful and supporting patients' autonomy, providers expressed significant anxiety about the reform, revealing a paradox in which supportive providers feared the effects of a liberalising policy. This anxiety stemmed from practical concerns about capacity associated with challenges in managing pain, complications, and emotional intensity in terminations after 12 weeks rather than moral objections. Healthcare workers felt responsible for adapting to new regulations without being informed about the practical implications for their work. Our findings suggest that gestational age may shape providers' emotional and possibly moral experience of abortion work in ways that are difficult to articulate within progressive contexts. This study demonstrates that expanding abortion access requires more than legislative change. Attention to abortion care providers' working conditions and expectations is crucial for translating progressive policies into good abortion care.
Abortion · Family planning · MEDLINE · Norwegian · Population · Ethics in medical practice · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Reproductive Health and Contraception
The Impact of ‘conscientious objection’ on abortion-related outcomes
Termination of a Wanted Pregnancy
From women’s ‘irresponsibility’ to foetal ‘patienthood’
Conscientious objection to abortion provision
The access paradox
Evaluation of Abortion Stigma in the Workforce
Abortion Stigma
Women's experiences when unsure about whether or not to have an abortion in the first trimester
Safe abortion in Latin America
Abortion in legal, social, and healthcare contexts
Abortion Stigma
Abortion stigma as a social process
Dropping the ball or holding the line? Challenges to abortion laws in the Nordic countries
Using thematic analysis in psychology
A good abortion experience
Dangertalk
Second Trimester Abortion Provision
Silent politics and unknown numbers
Trajectories of women's abortion-related care
Abortion
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |