Kant, Hermann Cohen, and the Form of Capitalism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23310694 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Garrath Williams (0000-0002-6583-8133, Lancaster University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-17 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-24 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Kantian Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-4154 • E-ISSN: 2044-2394 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1369415426101484 |
| OpenAlex | W7170893741 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 22 |
Hermann Cohen’s “neo-Kantian” critique of capitalism is primarily ethical. It is anchored in the principle that social relations must include people as ends in themselves, never merely as means. But Cohen draws on law to exemplify such inclusion: artificial legal persons such as cooperatives incorporate members as free and equal. I criticise Cohen for downplaying the constraints involved and, further, for only gesturing toward the role of law in capitalism. Kantian principles, if not Kant’s own views, can help address these flaws. I suggest that the form of capitalism rests on money, employment, and another sort of legal person, the business corporation.
Capitalism · Natural law · sort · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Hermann Cohen and the Crisis of Liberalism
Making Money
Kant's Theory of Labour
Kant's Doctrine of Right
Kant on Social Justice
Interdependent Independence
Hermann Cohen’s Neo-Kantian Ethical Socialism
Statistische Materialien Zur Konzessionierung Von Aktiengesellschaften in Preussen Bis 1867
Kant, coercion, and the legitimation of inequality
How who rides whom. Recent ‘new’ histories of American Labour law and what they may signify
Capitalism without the capitalist
Some Critical Issues in Social Ontology
Comparing Conceptions of Social Ontology
The Limits of Emergence
| Highly cited | No |
|---|