Does danmei fiction truly generate feminist impacts? Evidence from Hong Kong fans’ declarative and nondeclarative transformations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23310883 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew Ming-Tak Chew (0000-0001-5065-5652, Lingnan University, corresponding author), Yiyuan Zhang (0000-0002-6628-5147, Xi'an International Studies University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-19 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Feminist Media Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1468-0777 • E-ISSN: 1471-5902 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14680777.2026.2709386 |
| OpenAlex | W7171485547 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 60 |
This study engages with the debate over whether danmei fiction truly has feminist impacts. Its objective is to contribute to the debate by i) providing the necessary yet often ignored framing of this debate as but one of the many popular feminist sub-debates on various genres of feminist popular culture, ii) substantiating the sympathetic camp of the danmei debate in a more causally immediate, systematic, and direct manner than current studies do, iii) advancing the understanding of three scantily explored ways through which danmei generates feminist impact (i.e. shipping, non-binarity, and gender equality), and iv) and helping extend the empirical scope of the debate to Hong Kong data. This study also develops a general framework for analyzing popular fiction’s social impact by borrowing from cognitive psychology’s dual process perspective and literary studies’ concept of transformative reading. Our analysis finds that Hong Kong fans of danmei webnovels are led, consciously and unconsciously, by danmei content to take actions with feminist impact. This study’s data were collected from in-depth interviews with 22 Hong Kong fans.
Feminism · Feminist theory · Framing (construction) · Perspective (graphical) · Scope (computer science) · Transformative learning · Asian Culture and Media Studies · Chinese history and philosophy · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Abductive Analysis
The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Literary Studies
Homosexualizing “Boys Love” in China
Are Female Paraphilias Hiding in Plain Sight? Risqué Male–Male Erotica for Women in Sinophone and Anglophone Regions
Who is the Counterpublic? Bromance-as-Masquerade in Chinese Online Drama— S.C.I. Mystery
Desire in Subtext
Boy’s love drama exposure and attitudes toward same-sex relationships
Bisexual, pansexual, queer
Grotesque eroticism in the Danmei genre
The shackles of gender still exist
Culture beneath discourse
Reading matters
Fandom in the Digital Era
Girl power in boy love
The traffic in feminism
A very basic view of feminism”
The Chinese female spectatorship
Negotiating “misogyny”
Girls who love boys' love
Between screens and society
Ambivalent affective labor
Boys’ Love as Conditional Resilience
Beyond a queer utopia
The Tent’s Big Enough for Everyone’
Have Schemas Been Good To Think With
Can Talk Reveal Nondeclarative Culture? Deliberation Strategies in Talking About Social Controversies 1
Loving Boys Twice as Much
The Power of Qing
Still a Hetero-Gendered World
Chinese media production and fandom between queerbaiting and “survival instincts”
Cliché-ridden Online Danmei Fiction? A Case Study of Tianguan ci fu
Navigating the third wave
Shipping on the edge
Danmei , Xianqing, and the making of a queer online public sphere in China
When Feminist Falls in Love with Queer
A queer “socialist brotherhood
Exploring debates over “boys love” media in the Philippines
It is universal love beyond homosexuality and gender difference
Fiction and reality entangled
Improving Cultural Analysis
Postfeminism, popular feminism and neoliberal feminism? Sarah Banet-Weiser, Rosalind Gill and Catherine Rottenberg in conversation
Theorizing the Social Through Literary Fiction
Sexual Identity in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer or Questioning Emerging Adults
The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences
Motivation and Justification
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |