Turkey’s assertive turn in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
From cautious support to strategic engagement with Azerbaijan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23310898 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Levon Hovsepyan (0000-0002-7888-9597, Yerevan State University, corresponding author), Vahram Ter‐matevosyan (0000-0002-2212-0391, American University of Armenia) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-24 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1468-3857 • E-ISSN: 1743-9639 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14683857.2026.2704513 |
| OpenAlex | W7169866540 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 52 |
Unlike the early 1990s, when Ankara refrained from direct military involvement in the Nagorno-Karabakh war, in 2020 Turkey played a pivotal role in securing Azerbaijan’s military victory. Thus, the earlier cautious posturing gave way to strategic assertiveness. This study examines the domestic-level factors that enabled Turkey’s assertive engagement in the conflict with an unprecedented degree of power projection. By looking into the evolution of key domestic institutional dynamics and their implications for Turkey’s strategic turn, the paper comparatively analyzes the reasons behind Ankara’s positioning during the Nagorno-Karabakh wars in the 1990s and 2020. The article argues that Turkey’s autocratic turn, the neutralization of domestic checks and balances, the monopolization of decision-making, the expansion of military power and capabilities, and revisionist foreign policy posturing collectively conditioned Ankara’s involvement in the war.
Action (physics) · Assertiveness · Context (archaeology) · Government (linguistics) · Strategic planning · European Politics and Security · Multidisciplinary Science and Engineering Research · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
Turkish Foreign Policy since 1774
The South Caucasus Reconstructed
Conquering the state and subordinating society under AKP rule
The Militarization of Turkish Foreign Policy
Revisionism and Resecuritization of Turkey's Middle East Policy
Building a Competitive Authoritarian Regime
Causes of the Second Karabakh War
Repressed media and illiberal politics in Turkey
From ‘diplomacy’ to hard power? Restructuring, weakening, and sidelining of the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2009–2023)
Debating the hard power turn in Turkish foreign policy
Scope, drivers and manifestations of the realist turn in Turkish foreign policy
Populism at home, revisionism in the world”
Turkey, the Karabakh Conflict and the Legacy of the Eastern Question
Erdoğan’s engineering in the Turkish Armed Forces
Military might
Turkey in the Gulf Wars of 1991 and 2003
Foreign policy as a means of the AKP’s struggle with Kemalism in relation to domestic variables
Turkey’s quest for assertive foreign policy roles
Erdoğan and the Muslim Brotherhood
Linking Turkey’s domestic politics and foreign policy
The Transformation of the Geopolitical Vision in Turkish Foreign Policy
Dictating the Upper Tide
Strategic autonomy in Turkish foreign policy in an age of multipolarity
Revolutionary Governments, Recklessness, and War
Strategic autonomy in Turkish foreign policy
Beyond the Islamic State and Kurdish threat
Understanding oscillations in Turkish foreign policy
Technological determinism or strategic advantage? Comparing the two Karabakh Wars between Armenia and Azerbaijan
The Main Factors Underpinning Turkey–China Relations
Gamblers or Risk-Averse? Competitive Authoritarianism, the Centre–Periphery Cleavage and Nationalist Revisionism in Russia and Turkey
The partisan politics of foreign policy
From Beka to Ghaza? New Ontological Security Regime and Turkey’s Neo-Imperial Bid in World Politics
Fighting Isis in Syria
From alliance to 'soft conquest
The end of the 'revolution' (al-thawra) but not revolutionaries (thuwwār)
The Quest for Regional Leadership
Deadlocked in history and geopolitics
Turkish foreign policy in a post-western order
Populist hyperpersonalization and politicization of foreign policy institutions
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |