Improving Fairness in Criminal Justice Algorithmic Risk Assessments Using Optimal Transport and Conformal Prediction Sets
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2331148 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard A Berk (0000-0002-2983-1276, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA, corresponding author), Arun Kumar Kuchibhotla (0000-0003-4459-5352, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, corresponding author), Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1629-1675 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociological Methods & Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0049-1241 • E-ISSN: 1552-8294 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00491241231155883 |
| OpenAlex | W3212296934 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 47 |
In the United States and elsewhere, risk assessment algorithms are being used to help inform criminal justice decision-makers. A common intent is to forecast an offender's 'future dangerousness.' Such algorithms have been correctly criticized for potential unfairness, and there is an active cottage industry trying to make repairs. In this paper, we use counterfactual reasoning to consider the prospects for improved fairness when members of a disadvantaged class are treated by a risk algorithm as if they are members of an advantaged class. We combine a machine learning classifier trained in a novel manner with an optimal transport adjustment for the relevant joint probability distributions, which together provide a constructive response to claims of bias-in-bias-out. A key distinction is made between fairness claims that are empirically testable and fairness claims that are not. We then use confusion tables and conformal prediction sets to evaluate achieved fairness for estimated risk. Our data are a random sample of 300,000 offenders at their arraignments for a large metropolitan area in the United States during which decisions to release or detain are made. We show that substantial improvement in fairness can be achieved consistently with a Pareto improvement for legally protected classes
Actuarial science · Consistency (knowledge bases) · Constructive · Counterfactual thinking · Criminal justice · Criminology · Disadvantaged · Econometrics · Economics · Operations management · Pareto principle · Political science · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Psychology · Social Psychology
Criminology and Public Policy
Risk of being killed by police use of force in the United States by age, race–ethnicity, and sex
Statistical Modeling
Algorithmic Fairness
Fairness through awareness
Fair Prediction with Disparate Impact
Toward an understanding of structural racism
Greedy function approximation
Title unavailable
Using algorithms to address trade‐offs inherent in predicting recidivism
Mass incarceration, legal change, and locale
Estimating the Crime Effects of Raising the Age of Majority
Investigating Racial Profiling by the Miami‐dade Police Department
Criminal Justice Through “Colorblind” Lenses
Playing While White
Aging out of adolescent delinquency
Scandinavians in Chicago
Discrimination and disparity
Race, Ethnicity, and Criminal Justice Contact
Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System and Perceptions of Legitimacy
Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments
The Role of Race in Forecasts of Violent Crime
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |