Search engines in polarized media environment
Auditing political information curation on Google and Bing prior to 2024 US elections
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23311531 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mykola Makhortykh (0000-0001-7143-5317, University of Bern, corresponding author), Tobias Rohrbach (0000-0002-0151-1377), Tobias Rorhbach (University of Bern), Maryna Sydorova (0000-0001-7795-0459, University of Bern), Elizaveta Kuznetsova (0000-0002-3614-1804, University of Bern) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-18 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Information Technology & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1933-169X • E-ISSN: 1933-1681 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/19331681.2026.2701758 |
| OpenAlex | W4406271095 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 50 |
Search engines (SEs) influence how individuals are informed about election-related developments and perceive the environment in which elections take place. It has particular implications for (perceived) polarization, especially if SEs’ curation leads to a skewed treatment of information sources; however, until now, it is unclear how different SE factors may affect the emergence of such a partisan gap. To address this shortcoming, we audit the two largest Western SEs, Google and Bing, prior to the 2024 US presidential elections and examine how retrieval of election-related information varies depending on the queries’ thematic focus, user location, and time when the search was conducted. Our findings indicate that both SEs prioritize left-leaning journalistic media sources, with the degree of ideological slant varying between Democratic- and Republican-focused queries. We also observe limited effects of location- and time-based factors on organic results, but more volatility for results from additional interface elements.
Audit · Business · Internet privacy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · World Wide Web · Accounting · Computer Science · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Social Media and Politics
Algorithms of Oppression
Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed
Should we worry about filter bubbles?
Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape
Bias in computer systems
Online News User Journeys
Google, how should I vote? How users formulate search queries to find political information on search engines
Bubbles bursting
Where the earth is flat and 9/11 is an inside job
Googling Referendum Campaigns
Partisan search behavior and Google results in the 2018 U.S. midterm elections
The Prevalence and Consequences of Women’s Algorithmic Underrepresentation in Cross-National Political Google Searches
Codes of conduct for algorithmic news recommendation
Generic or Specific Search Terms
Googling Politics? Comparing Five Computational Methods to Identify Political and News-related Searches from Web Browser Histories
Memory, counter-memory and denialism
More of the Same? Homogenization in News Recommendations When Users Search on Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter
Foreign beauties want to meet you”
Googling Politics
The Matter of Chance
Divided by the Algorithm? The (Limited) Effects of Content- and Sentiment-Based News Recommendation on Affective, Ideological, and Perceived Polarization
Novelty in News Search
On the Democratic Role of News Recommenders
Investigating Search Engine Optimization Factors in Media Websites
Attracting the news
Biased Representation of Politicians in Google and Wikipedia Search? The Joint Effect of Party Identity, Gender Identity and Elections
Mediatization of Politics
Google, data voids, and the dynamics of the politics of exclusion
Digital Hegemonies
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |