Recognised nature’s contributions to people vary for native and introduced trees across land uses
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23312412 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lena Strauß (0000-0002-6216-062X, University of Leeds), Ricardo F De Lima (0000-0002-0184-3945, University of Lisbon), Timothy R Baker (0000-0002-3251-1679, University of Leeds), Laura Benítez (0000-0002-8863-8353, Fauna and Flora International), Gilles Dauby (0000-0002-9498-413X, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Maria do Céu Madureira (0000-0002-3017-0866, University of Coimbra), Estevão Soares (Centro Nacional de Endemias), Pascoal Sousa (Centro Nacional de Endemias), Tariq Stévart (0000-0002-6212-0361, Meise Botanic Garden), Martin Dallimer (0000-0001-8120-3309, University of Leeds, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-12-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ecosystems and People (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2639-5908 • E-ISSN: 2639-5916 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/26395916.2026.2691546 |
| OpenAlex | W7169763173 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 87 |
Land-use change affects biodiversity, which, in turn, underpins nature’s contributions to people (NCP). However, there is much uncertainty about the relationships between NCP and distinct land uses, given that anthropogenic impacts and biodiversity (e.g. proportions of native and introduced species) vary across landscapes. To address this gap, we studied the types, distribution, and species origins of trees that are recognised as underpinning NCP, according to expert biocultural knowledge. Trees were sampled along 81 transects across urban, rural, and natural zones on the Afrotropical island of São Tomé. Both native and introduced trees were mainly recognised for material contributions (171 of 176 species and 6,522 of 6,530 individuals), notably for materials and assistance (e.g. building materials) and energy (fuel wood, charcoal). These biomass-intensive contributions were commonly associated with trees in the natural zone, where native and endemic species dominated. Few of these species were recognised for non-material and regulating contributions. In contrast, trees in the rural and urban zones were mostly introduced and commonly associated with non-material (e.g. aesthetic value) and regulating contributions (e.g. microclimate). These contributions may have been under-recognised as they were implicitly associated with trees, were not aligned with individual species, or were largely invisible from a biocultural knowledge perspective. Both native and introduced species were recognised for diverse NCP across zones, highlighting that conservation strategies might have to be extended into human-modified landscapes to improve social legitimacy. More work, building on the biocultural baseline of this study, is necessary to understand how NCP are realised.
Identification (biology) · Land use · Population · Tree (set theory) · Vegetation (pathology) · Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
The Use of Medicinal Plants by Migrant People
Global trends of local ecological knowledge and future implications
Urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa
Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species
Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services
Scientists' warning on invasive alien species
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Assessing nature's contributions to people
Post-apartheid ecologies in the City of Cape Town
Social network analysis reveals a lack of support for greenspace conservation
Territory, Economy, and Demographic Growth in São Tomé and Príncipe
Disentangling ‘ecosystem services’ and ‘nature’s contributions to people’
Science on ecosystems and people to support the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework
Co‐production of nature's contributions to people
Disentangling gender and social difference for just and transformative biocultural approaches
Non‐material contributions of nature expressed by former tourists of Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
Understanding urban–rural linkages from an ecological perspective
The influence of forest proximity to harvesting and use of provisioning ecosystem services from tree species in traditional agroforestry landscapes
Operationalizing the biocultural perspective in conservation practice
Nature's contributions to people
Securing Nature’s Contributions to People requires at least 20%–25% (semi-)natural habitat in human-modified landscapes
The forgotten coal
Social-ecological outcomes of agricultural intensification
Valuing nature’s contributions to people
What drives smallholder tree growing? Enabling conditions in a changing policy environment
Trees for life
Nature-dependent people
Plant Knowledge and Current Uses of Woody Flora in Three Cultural Groups of the Brazilian Semiarid Region
Local perceptions and factors determining ecosystem services identification around two forest reserves in Northern Benin
How does urbanization affect perceptions and traditional knowledge of medicinal plants
The role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in effective and equitable conservation
| Highly cited | No |
|---|