Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Methods of Presenting Scientific Evidence in Court

Panels Versus Party Witnessing in School Desegregation Cases

Bibliographic Data

ID2331499
AuthorsMark A Chesler (0000-0002-2330-6286, University of Michigan), Debra S Kalmu, Debra Kalmuss (Johns Hopkins University), Debra S Kalmuss (Johns Hopkins University), Joseph Sanders (University of Houston)
Year1983
Volume11
Issue4
Pages443-468
Publication date1983-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociological Methods & Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0049-1241 • E-ISSN: 1552-8294
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0049124183011004004
OpenAlexW2140479916
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited15

This article presents and analyzes lawyers' and scientists' views of the advisability of using alternatives to the party witness format (e.g., scientific panels) in school desegregation cases. Scientists' and attorneys' desires to control the presentation of evidence and courtroom interaction is one factor explaining their preference for panels or party witness formats. In addition, control is seen as a means of influencing several other issues: selection of an appropriate form of dispute settlement in this litigation; management of potential bias in social science scholarship and testimony; and determination of the proper role of expert witnesses. These issues are investigated with a sample of lawyers and scholars who tried and testified in 17 school desegregation cases across the nation

Control (management) · Desegregation · Expert witness · Plaintiff · Political science · Presentation (obstetrics) · Sample (material) · Scholarship · Settlement (finance) · Sociology · Witness · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Legal Issues in Education

  • Does the Law Matter? Federal District Court Decision-Making in Fair Housing Cases, 1968-89

    Open Access•Kimi King, Kimi Lynn King•Social Science Research•1998

  • Serving Two Masters

    Derrick Bell, Derrick A Bell•The Yale Law Journal•1976

  • Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma

    Derrick Bell, Derrick A Bell•Harvard Law Review•1980

  • School Desegregation

    Mark A Chesler, Walter G Stephan et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1982

  • The Practitioner Speaks

    Open Access•Peter W Williams, Paul W Williams•Journal of Social Issues•1957

  • Meeting the Courts' New Research Needs

    Open Access•Mary Von Euler•Education and Urban Society•1977

  • The Relevance of "Irrelevant" Testimony

    Open Access•Joseph Sanders, Betty Rankin-Widgeon et al.•Law & Society Review•1982

  • Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead

    Open Access•M Galanter•Law & Society Review•1974

  • From Max Weber

    Max Weber, H H Gerth et al.•From Max Weber•2014

  • Political Conflict in Applied Scholarship

    Debra Kalmu, Debra Kalmuss et al.•Social Problems•1982

  • The Social Scientist's Role in the Preparation of the Florida Desegregation Brief

    Lewis M Killian•Social Problems•1956

  • Professionalization of Sociology

    Morris Janowitz•American Journal of Sociology•1972

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,04
Citation span1998 - 1998 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae