Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What do philosophers believe?

Bibliographic Data

ID23315652
AuthorsDavid Bourget (0000-0003-0155-9634, Western University, corresponding author), David J Chalmers (0000-0003-2258-0520, National University)
Year2014
Volume170
Issue3
Pages465-500
Publication date2014-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophical Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8116 • E-ISSN: 1573-0883
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11098-013-0259-7
OpenAlexW2131213789
LanguageEN
Citations received132
References cited3

Epistemology · Immigration · Metaphysics · Nationality · Order (exchange) · Philosophical analysis · Philosophical methodology · Philosophy of language · Philosophy of mind · Political science · Sociology · Variation (astronomy) · Counseling Practices and Supervision · Cultural Differences and Values · Law · Philosophy · Social and Intergroup Psychology

  • Miejsce człowieka we wszechświecie. (Nie)religijne narracje polskich i ukraińskich przyrodników

    Open Access•Maria Rogińska•Studia Socjologiczne•2019

  • The specificity of historical-philosophical research in the Humanities

    Open Access•Alexander A Lvov•Vestnik of Saint Petersburg…•2021

  • Religião, Conservadorismo e Inteligência

    Open Access•Agnaldo Cuoco Portugal•Revista Brasileira de Filosofia…•2020

  • Deus é Possível? Logo, Existe! Novas Versões do Argumento Ontológico Modal

    Open Access•Domingos Faria•Revista Brasileira de Filosofia…•2020

  • Fisicalismo e o problema mente-cérebro

    Open Access•Julio César Martins Mazzoni•Sofia•2019

  • Global ethics

    Keith Horton•Journal of Global Ethics•2014

  • Moral Realism and Expert Disagreement

    Open Access•Prabhpal Singh•Trames Journal of the Humanities…•2020

  • Mapping the mind

    Open Access•Marco J Nathan, Guillermo Del Pinal•Synthese•2016

  • How not to test for philosophical expertise

    Open Access•Regina Rini, Regina A Rini•Synthese•2015

  • Thinking about Progress

    Open Access•Finnur Dellsén, Insa Lawler et al.•Noûs•2022

  • Implications of Rejecting Common‐Sense Realism for the Practice and Aim of Knowledge‐Based Education

    Open Access•Henrik Friberg‐fernro•Educational Theory•2025

  • Did Dewey Have a Theory of Truth

    John Capps, John Capps John Capps•Transactions of the Charles S…•2018

  • The Arbitrariness of Aesthetic Judgment

    Open Access•David Sackris•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2020

  • Free Will

    Alfred R Mele•Free Will•2022

  • Ethics and Religion

    Open Access•Harry J Gensler•Ethics and Religion•2016

  • Representational Content and the Objects of Thought

    Open Access•Nicholas Rimell•Representational Content and the…•2021

  • Neuroethics

    Joshua May•Neuroethics•2023

  • The Cambridge History of Atheism

    Open Access•Michael Ruse, Stephen Bullivant•Cambridge History of Atheism•2021

  • Mental Causation

    Open Access•Thomas Kroedel•Mental Causation•2019

  • The Challenges of Divine Determinism

    Open Access•Peter Furlong•Challenges of Divine Determinism•2019

  • Recommender Systems

    Open Access•Sergio Genovesi, Katharina Kaesling et al.•Recommender Systems•2023

  • The Roman Empire

    Open Access•Nicole Hartmann•Cambridge History of Atheism•2021

  • Beyond sacrificial harm

    Open Access•Guy Kahane, Jim A C Everett et al.•Psychological Review•2018

  • Philosophers on Philosophy

    Open Access•David Bourget, David J Chalmers•Philosophers' Imprint•2023

  • A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition

    Shuli Barzilai, Sarit Barzilai et al.•Educational Psychologist•2020

  • Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good

    Open Access•Paul Conway, Jacob Goldstein-Greenwood et al.•Cognition•2018

  • On the “Virtue Turn” and the Problem of Categorizing Chinese Thought

    Open Access•Eric L Hutton•Dao•2015

  • The Beliefs of Nonbelievers

    Open Access•J Blankholm, R T Cragun et al.•Sociology of Religion•2025

  • Entertainment Politics as a Modernist Project in a Baudrillard World

    Open Access•Julia C Richmond, Douglas V Porpora•Communication Theory•2018

  • Does economic education spoil students’ morality? Economists and the Trolley problem

    Open Access•Joanna Dzionek-Kozlowska, Joanna Dzionek‐Kozłowska et al.•Economics & Sociology•2024

  • If analytic philosophy of religion is sick, can it be cured

    Open Access•Moti Mizrahi•Religious Studies•2019

  • Some Socratic Modesty

    Open Access•David Sackris, Michael T Dale•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2024

  • Multidisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity, and Transdisciplinarity

    Open Access•Marcin J Schroeder•Philosophies•2022

  • On Being Twice Exceptional in Sweden—An Interview-Based Case Study about the Educational Situation for a Gifted Student Diagnosed with ADHD

    Open Access•Anna-Carin Holmgren, Ylva Backman et al.•Education Sciences•2023

  • Great Minds do not Think Alike

    Open Access•Nick Byrd•Review of Philosophy and Psychology•2023

  • Expressive Responding, Experimental Philosophy, and Philosophical Expertise

    Open Access•Shane N Glackin•Review of Philosophy and Psychology•2024

  • Moral Disagreement and Moral Education

    Open Access•Dominik Balg•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2024

  • The Relativistic Car

    Open Access•Thomas Pölzler•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2021

  • Interdisciplinary Confusion and Resolution in the Context of Moral Machines

    Open Access•Jakob Stenseke•Science and Engineering Ethics•2022

  • Dualists and physicalists agree, free will is incompatible with determinism

    Mark Wulff Carstensen, Stephan Sellmaier et al.•Philosophical Psychology•2025

  • Causal attributions and the trolley problem

    Justin Sytsma, Jonathan Livengood•Philosophical Psychology•2021

  • The psychology of philosophy

    David B Yaden, Derek Egan Anderson•Philosophical Psychology•2021

  • Ideological diversity, hostility, and discrimination in philosophy

    Uwe Peters, Nathan Honeycutt et al.•Philosophical Psychology•2020

  • Empirical Studies on Truth and the Project of Re‐engineering Truth

    Open Access•Kara Reuter, Gerard Brun•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2022

  • Disagreement and Progress in Philosophy and in Empirical Sciences

    Işık Sarıhan•Social Epistemology•2026

  • Explicit Methodologies for Normative Evaluation in Public Policy, as Applied to Carbon Budgets

    Open Access•Kian Mintz‐woo•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2025

  • Subtracting Self-Selection Bias from Scientific Inquiry

    Open Access•Marina Moreno•Erkenntnis•2026

  • An Evolutionary Sceptical Challenge to Scientific Realism

    Open Access•Christophe de Ray•Erkenntnis•2022

  • Tickles, iteration, and habits

    Open Access•Kenny Easwaran, Benjamin A Levinstein et al.•Theory and Decision•2026

  • An Axiological-Trajectory Theodicy

    Open Access•Thomas R Metcalf•Sophia•2020

  • Moral disagreement scepticism leveled

    Open Access•Jonathan Dixon•Ratio•2021

  • Philosophical producers, philosophical consumers, and the metaphilosophical value of original texts

    Open Access•Ethan Landes•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • Resisting the epistemic argument for compatibilism

    Open Access•Patrick Todd, Brian Rabern•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • “Resuscitating the Common Consent Argument for Theism”

    Open Access•Matthew Braddock•International Journal for…•2023

  • Divine foreknowledge and human free will

    Open Access•Michael Devito, Tyler Dalton Mcnabb•International Journal for…•2021

  • Understanding philosophy

    Open Access•Matthew Hannon, Michael Hannon et al.•Inquiry•2026

  • Fully experimental conceptual engineering

    James Andow•Inquiry•2025

  • How not to argue for the presumption of liberty

    Jason Brennan, Christopher Freiman•Inquiry•2025

  • Intuitions about cases as evidence (for how we should think)

    James Andow•Inquiry•2023

  • Some hazards of motivational internalism

    Brendan Cline•Inquiry•2020

  • Ownership and convention

    Open Access•Shaun Nichol, Shaun Nichols et al.•Cognition•2023

  • Zombie intuitions

    Open Access•Eugen Fischer, Justin Sytsma•Cognition•2021

  • Your health vs. my liberty

    Open Access•Nick Byrd, Michal Bialek•Cognition•2021

  • Pundits and Possibilities

    Daniel Kilov, Caroline Hendy•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2023

  • The Less Said The Better

    John Capps•Archiv für Geschichte der…•2022

  • Uncovering Alethia

    Open Access•James Kelly White•Journal of Critical Realism•2025

  • Early-Modern Irreligion and Theological Analogy

    Open Access•Daniel Linford•Secularism and Nonreligion•2016

  • Pragmatist Historiography in Unmodern Philosophy and Modern Philosophy

    Open Access•Phillip Deen•European Journal of Pragmatism…•2013

  • To Tell the Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth

    Open Access•Susan P Shapiro•Annual Review of Law and Social…•2022

  • Is there truth in fiction? Lessons from readers’ responses to dementia fiction

    Open Access•Jane Lugea, Carolina Fernandez-Quintanilla et al.•Medical Humanities•2024

  • The Chinese and American Students and the Trolley Problem

    Open Access•Sharaf Rehman, Joanna Dzionek-Kozłowsk•Journal of Intercultural…•2020

  • Taking back control

    Robert Jubb•Critical Review of International…•2020

  • Worries About Philosopher Experts

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2023

  • Are Intuitions Treated as Evidence? Cases from Political Philosophy

    Open Access•Sebastian J Conte•Journal of Political Philosophy•2022

  • The free will inventory

    Open Access•Thomas Nadelhoffer, Jason Shepard et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2014

  • A free will needs a free mind

    Open Access•Matthias Forstmann, Pascal Burgmer•Consciousness and Cognition•2018

  • The future of war

    Open Access•Steven Umbrello, Phil Torres et al.•AI & Society•2020

  • Discourse analysis of academic debate of ethics for AGI

    Open Access•Ross Graham•AI & Society•2022

  • Intentionality, belief, and the logical problem of evil

    Open Access•Kenneth L Pearce•Religious Studies•2020

  • Indirect epistemic reasons and religious belief

    Open Access•Kirk Lougheed, Rosemary Michelle Simpson et al.•Religious Studies•2017

  • Aspirational theism and gratuitous suffering

    Open Access•Jimmy Alfonso Licon•Religious Studies•2021

  • Methodological Exclusion of the Transcendent? Implications for Theory and Research in Religion, Spirituality and Health

    Open Access•Alexander Moreira-Almeida, Ralph W Hood•Journal of Religion and Health•2024

  • Toward a new kalām cosmological argument

    Open Access•Benjamin Victor Waters, Peter Stanley Fosl•Cogent Arts and Humanities•2015

  • Typologies of Scepticism in the Philosophical Tradition of Kalām

    Open Access•Abdurrahman Ali Mihirig•Theoria•2022

  • Critical Realism as Relational Sociology

    Open Access•Douglas V Porpora•The Palgrave Handbook of…•2018

  • Monotheism and the Rise of Science

    Open Access•J L Schellenberg•Monotheism and the Rise of Science•2020

  • Algorithmic Political Bias—an Entrenchment Concern

    Open Access•Ulrik Franke•Philosophy & Technology•2022

  • Planets, pluralism, and conceptual lineage

    Open Access•Carl Brusse•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2016

  • Robots make ethics honest

    Open Access•Wilhelm E J Klein•ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society•2016

  • Consciousness intuitions are illusory

    Open Access•Iris Berent•Consciousness and Cognition•2026

  • Thinking differently

    Paul Mckee, Khaoula Boulhadi et al.•Philosophical Psychology•2026

  • The Ineffability of Induction

    Open Access•David Builes•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2020

  • The Role of Consciousness in Grasping and Understanding

    Open Access•David Bourget•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2015

  • What is philosophical progress

    Open Access•Finnur Dellsén, Tina Firing et al.•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2024

  • Does religious belief infect philosophical analysis

    Kevin Tobia, Kevin Patrick Tobia•Religion Brain & Behavior•2016

  • Views on the mind-brain problem do matter

    Open Access•Marianna De Abreu Costa, Alexander Moreira-Almeida•Consciousness and Cognition•2025

  • The nature of mind scale (Noms)

    Open Access•Matthias Forstmann, Pascal Burgmer•Consciousness and Cognition•2026

  • An epistemic alternative to the public justification requirement

    Open Access•Henrik Friberg-Fernros, Henrik Friberg‐fernro et al.•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2024

  • What exploitation is

    Open Access•Benjamin Ferguson, Peter Hans Matthews et al.•American Journal of Political…•2026

  • How do philosophers and nonphilosophers think about philosophy? And does personality make a difference

    Open Access•James Andow•Synthese•2022

  • "General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured

    C Spearman•The American Journal of Psychology•1904

  • LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space

    Karl Pearson•The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin…•1901

  • A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis

    Open Access•John L Horn•Psychometrika•1965

Unique citing works132
Citations per year10,15
Citation span2013 - 2026 (14)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 120
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae