Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

I.—studies in the Logic of Confirmation (I.)

Bibliographic Data

ID23316626
AuthorsCarl G Hempel (corresponding author)
Year1945
Volume54
Issue213
Pages1-26
Publication date1945-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMind (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-4423 • E-ISSN: 1460-2113
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/mind/liv.213.1
OpenAlexW4232307725
LanguageEN
Citations received97

Journal Article I.—STUDIES IN THE LOGIC OF CONFIRMATION (I.) Get access CARL G. HEMPEL CARL G. HEMPEL Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Mind, Volume LIV, Issue 213, January 1945, Pages 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIV.213.1 Published: 01 January 1945

Epistemology · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology · Theology and Philosophy of Evil

  • Have Bayesians Solved the Paradox of the Ravens

    Open Access•Amit Karmon•Philosophy of Science•2026

  • Why Confirm Laws

    Barry Ward•The British Journal for the…•2025

  • The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870–1945

    Open Access•Thomas Baldwin•CAMBRIDGE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY,…•2003

  • Philosophy of Experimental Biology

    Open Access•Marcel Weber•Philosophy of experimental biology•2004

  • The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1945–2015

    Open Access•Iain Thomson, Kelly Becker et al.•Cambridge History of Philosophy,…•2019

  • Realism and Scientific Progress

    Philip Kitcher•The Advancement of Science•1995

  • Hypothetico‐Deductive Method

    Open Access•Carlo Martini•Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2017

  • French Catholic philosophy

    Open Access•Daniel Leduc-Fayette•CAMBRIDGE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY,…•2003

  • Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism

    Open Access•Sandra D Mitchell•Biological Complexity and…•2003

  • Statistical Inference as Severe Testing

    Open Access•Deborah G Mayo•Statistical Inference As Severe…•2018

  • Problems for Dogmatism

    Open Access•Roger White•Philosophical Studies•2006

  • Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated?

    Open Access•L Jonathan Cohen, Larry Cohen•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1981

  • Confirmation Bias

    Open Access•Raymond S Nickerson•Review of General Psychology•1998

  • Reply to Crupi et al.'s ‘Bayesian Confirmation by Uncertain Evidence’ ([2008])

    Franz Huber•The British Journal for the…•2008

  • The Philosophy of Curatorial Practice

    Open Access•Rossen Ventzislavov•The British Journal of Aesthetics•2021

  • Some comments on the projectibility of anthropological hypotheses

    Open Access•Steven J Miller, Marcel Fredericks•Erkenntnis•1989

  • Issues of Generalization From Unreliable or Unrepresentative Stimuli

    Open Access•Jiangtian Li, Blair C Armstrong•Open MIND•2025

  • The P–T Probability Framework for Semantic Communication, Falsification, Confirmation, and Bayesian Reasoning

    Open Access•Chenguang Lu•Philosophies•2020

  • The Artificial Intelligence Explanatory Trade-Off on the Logic of Discovery in Chemistry

    Open Access•José Ferraz-Caetano•Philosophies•2023

  • The probability of conditionals

    Open Access•Miguel López-Astorga, Marco Ragni et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2022

  • Relevance via Topicality in First Order Logics

    Open Access•Nicholas Ferenz, Andrew Tedder•Erkenntnis•2025

  • Relevance as difference-making

    Open Access•Gerhard Schurz•Philosophical Studies•2024

  • Evidentialism, justification, and knowledge‐first

    Open Access•Anthony Bird•Noûs•2025

  • Fundamentality physicalism

    Gabriel Oak Rabin•Inquiry•2022

  • The Positive Argument for Impermissivism

    Lisa Cassell•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2025

  • Lotman’s Semiosphere, Peirce’s Signs, and Cultural Processes

    Floyd Μerrell•Russian Journal of Communication•2008

  • Can there be a burden of the best explanation

    Open Access•Gustavo Ribeiro•The International Journal of…•2018

  • A fiction of long standing’

    Open Access•Christian Dayé•History of the Human Sciences•2016

  • Beware the default

    Brian Manata, Franklin J Boster•Communication Research Reports•2026

  • Question-driven stepwise experimental discoveries in biochemistry

    Open Access•Michael Fry•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2022

  • Crediting or blaming theories or auxiliary assumptions for empirical victories or defeats

    Open Access•David Trafimow, Tom St Quinton et al.•Theory & Psychology•2024

  • A History of Theoria

    Open Access•Sven Ove Hansson, Oskar Hansson•Theoria•2009

  • Hume's Problem

    Colin Howson•Hume's Problem•2000

  • The Wason Task(s) and the Paradox of Confirmation

    Open Access•Branden Fitelson, James Hawthorne•Philosophical Perspectives•2010

  • Carnap's inductive probabilities as a contribution to decision theory

    Open Access•Joachim Hornung•Metamedicine•1980

  • Permissivism and the Value of Rationality

    Open Access•Miriam Schoenfield•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2018

  • Implication and entailment in Navya-Ny?ya logic

    Open Access•V K Bharadwaja•Journal of Indian Philosophy•1987

  • Logical Analyses of Vipassanā Meditation

    C P Hertogh•Contemporary Buddhism•2018

  • Borgess realities and Peirces semiosis

    Open Access•Floyd Merrell•Semiotica•2002

  • Trial and Error

    Susan Haack•American Journal of Public Health•2005

  • The anticipated belief differences theory of prejudice

    Open Access•Michael E Hyland, Michael Hyland•European Journal of Social…•1974

  • Evidential monism, evidential pluralism, or evidential contextualism? An introduction to evidential diversity in the social sciences

    Open Access•Yafeng Shan, Jon Williamson•Synthese•2022

  • Formal schemas of induction as models

    Open Access•Vlademire Kevin D Bumatay•Synthese•2022

  • Conceptual spaces

    Open Access•Sylka Scholz, Gottfried Vosgerau•Synthese•2025

  • Natural concepts

    Open Access•Corina Strößner•Synthese•2025

  • A deductive variation on the no miracles argument

    Open Access•Luke Golemon, Abraham Graber•Synthese•2023

  • Is strong inference really superior to simple inference

    Open Access•John Mcdonald, John H McDonald•Synthese•1992

  • Some remarks on induction

    Open Access•Christine M Crow, C Crow•Synthese•1963

  • Varieties of modal (classificatory) and comparative probability

    Open Access•Peter Walley, Terrence L Fine•Synthese•1979

  • The logic of epistemic justification

    Open Access•Martin Smith•Synthese•2018

  • Criteria for naturalness in conceptual spaces

    Open Access•Corina Strößner•Synthese•2022

  • Anything confirms anything

    Open Access•Herbert E Hendry, James E Roper•Synthese•1980

  • Assessing theories, Bayes style

    Open Access•Franz Huber•Synthese•2008

  • The frame problem, the relevance problem, and a package solution to both

    Open Access•Yingjin Xu, Pei Wang•Synthese•2012

  • On the laws of nature

    Open Access•Gerhard D Wassermann•Synthese•1982

  • The Ravens Paradox” is a misnomer

    Open Access•Rhaine Clarke•Synthese•2010

  • Inductive systematization

    Open Access•Ilkka Niiniluoto•Synthese•1972

  • The evidential support theory of conditionals

    Open Access•Igor Douven•Synthese•2008

  • Goodness, availability, and argument structure

    Open Access•Anna‐Sara Malmgren, Anna-Sara Malmgren•Synthese•2021

  • Proper bootstrapping

    Open Access•Igor Douven, Christoph Kelp•Synthese•2013

  • On the equivalence of Goodman’s and Hempel’s paradoxes

    Kenneth Boyce•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2014

  • On the viability of the No Alternatives Argument

    Open Access•Tushar Menon•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2019

  • What Elements of Successful Scientific Theories Are the Correct Targets for “Selective” Scientific Realism

    Open Access•Dean Peters•Philosophy of Science•2014

  • Studies in the Logic of Explanation

    Open Access•Carl G Hempel, Paul Oppenheim•Philosophy of Science•1948

  • Urning a Resolution of Hempel's Paradox

    Open Access•Stuart L Meyer•Philosophy of Science•1977

  • Nicod's Criterion

    Open Access•William W Rozeboom•Philosophy of Science•1980

  • Beyond Divorce

    Open Access•Thomas Nickles•Philosophy of Science•1985

  • Goodman, ‘Grue’ and Hempel

    Open Access•C A Hooker•Philosophy of Science•1968

  • Explanatory Stabilization in Situations of Evidential Uncertainty

    Open Access•Samuel Schindler•Philosophy of Science•2025

  • Confirmation Theory, Order, and Periodicity

    Open Access•Peter Achinstein•Philosophy of Science•1963

  • An Orthodox Statistical Resolution of the Paradox of Confirmation

    Open Access•Ronald N Giere•Philosophy of Science•1970

  • The Problem of Measure Sensitivity Redux

    Open Access•Peter Brössel•Philosophy of Science•2013

  • A New Bayesian Solution to the Paradox of the Ravens

    Open Access•Susanna Rinard•Philosophy of Science•2014

  • The Spirit of Logical Empiricism

    Open Access•Wesley C Salmon•Philosophy of Science•1999

  • A Framework for Pragmatic Reliability

    Open Access•Isaac Davis•Philosophy of Science•2020

  • A Representation Theorem for Absolute Confirmation

    Open Access•Michael Schippers•Philosophy of Science•2017

  • Resolving the Raven Paradox

    Open Access•Barry Ward•Philosophy of Science•2022

  • Data, Evidence, and Explanatory Power

    Open Access•Pascal Ströing•Philosophy of Science•2018

  • High Cost of Scientific Ignorance

    Open Access•Sharon Mason, Demosthenes Lorandos•Journal of Social Issues•2025

  • On the icy slopes of expertise

    Open Access•Christian Dayé•Futures•2022

  • Is the Progress of Science Evolutionary

    L Jonathan Cohen, Larry Cohen•The British Journal for the…•1973

  • Prediction Versus Accommodation and the Risk of Overfitting

    Christopher Hitchcock, Elliott Sober•The British Journal for the…•2004

  • Bayesian Confirmation

    Peter Brössel, Franz Huber•The British Journal for the…•2015

  • A Hybrid Theory of Induction

    Adrià Segarra•The British Journal for the…•2025

  • Hempel's Raven Paradox

    Peter B M Vranas•The British Journal for the…•2004

  • Bayesian Confirmation

    R D Rosenkrantz•The British Journal for the…•1994

  • Are Empirical Evidence Claims A Priori

    Peter Achinstein•The British Journal for the…•1995

  • The Paradoxes of Confirmation

    H G Alexander, Heather Alexander•The British Journal for the…•1958

  • The Point of Positive Evidence—reply to Professor Feyerabend

    Tom Settle, T W Settle•The British Journal for the…•1969

  • Laws, Systems, and Research Designs

    Open Access•H David Tuggle, Alex H Townsend et al.•American Antiquity•1972

  • Testing for Necessary and/or Sufficient Causation

    Open Access•Jason Seawright•Political Analysis•2002

  • The Advancement of Science

    Philip Kitcher•The Advancement of Science•1995

  • Analogy and the Acceptance of Theory in Archaeology

    Open Access•M J Morwood, Mike Morwood•American Antiquity•1975

  • Bayesianism II

    Open Access•Kenny Easwaran•Philosophy Compass•2011

  • Philosophy of Science circa 1950-2000

    Open Access•Harold I Brown•Diogenes•2014

  • On the scientific credibility of paleoanthropology

    Open Access•B Villmoare, William H Kimbel et al.•Evolutionary Anthropology Issues…•2024

  • An epistemological turn

    Open Access•Stephen P Reyna•Critique of Anthropology•2012

Unique citing works97
Citations per year1,24
Citation span1948 - 2026 (79)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 95
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae