Toward a Geoeconomic Order in International Trade and Investment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23317822 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anthea Roberts (0000-0002-8775-0001, Australian National University), Henrique Choer Moraes (0000-0001-8403-044X, KU Leuven), Victor Ferguson (0000-0002-6189-9967, Australian National University) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 655-676 |
| Publication date | 2019-12-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of International Economic Law (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-3034 • E-ISSN: 1464-3758 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jiel/jgz036 |
| OpenAlex | W2981442232 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 78 |
| References cited | 7 |
Recent developments suggest that the international economic order is transitioning away from the Neoliberal Order that has flourished for much of the post-Cold War period toward a new Geoeconomic Order. The shift to this new order, which is characterized by a growing ‘securitisation of economic policy and economisation of strategic policy’, will likely see the rules, norms, and institutions of international trade and investment law undergoing significant change. We expose the differences in the underlying logic of these orders, explore how this shift is being driven by the emerging USA–China tech/trade war, and consider the consequences of this transition for global economic governance.
China · Cold war · Corporate governance · Economic governance · Economic system · Economics · International trade · Investment (military) · Management · Order (exchange) · Political economy · Political science · Trade war · World order · Finance · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · World Trade Organization Law
Introduction
Governing Cross-Border Data Flows
The Spectre of State Capitalism
Geoeconomics and the return of economic nationalism in international trade law
Infrastructural Perspectives on Global Ordering
Fortune or Fear? State Legislators’ Responses to Chinese Ownership of US Agricultural Land
Rescaling Geoeconomics
Economic Lawfare
The permissive invisibility of trust law
On the Sino-Egyptian Geo-Relations in the Perspective of the Belt and Road——Based on Event Data Analysis
China and the WHO pandemic treaty
The EU 's strategic autonomy in times of politicisation of international trade
New is old? The EU 's Open, Sustainable and Assertive Trade Policy
Naïve no more
La política económica exterior frente a los desafíos de la poliglobalización
Geo-economic and geopolitical developments in EU-asia security relations
Normative power meets realism
The Evolution of Chinese FDI in Europe and Its Implications for Technological Interdependence
On the Innovative Pathway of the Rule of Law for the Belt and Road Initiative
China's Export Controls on Strategic Materials
Hotspot Geopolitics
Mirages or miracles? Lithium extraction and the just energy transition
US Critical Mineral Policies and Alliance Strategies in an Age of Geopolitical Rivalry
Commerce and Security Meet in the European Union’s Trade Defence Instruments
The EU De‐Risking of Energy Dependencies
Bounded States”
The China Gambit
The Geoeconomic Turn in EU Trade and Investment Policy
Drivers and Limits of the Geoeconomic Turn in EU Infrastructure Policy
The Security–Sustainability Nexus
The geoeconomics of infrastructures
Linking geoeconomic and financial de-risking in European energy infrastructure
External pressures from ‘enemies’, ‘rivals’ and ‘allies’
Strategically (in)secure and economically (in)vulnerable
Why is economic interdependence not weaponised? Security constraints on geoeconomic coercion in Southeast Asia
Aukus ‘behind the scenes’
From geopolitics to geoeconomics and back. Why age of geoeconomics is over
State capital in a geoeconomic world
Between market and state
Continuity in times of geoeconomic change
Rethinking boundaries
Changing Causal Narratives and Risk Perceptions on Foreign Investment
Goodbye Washington Confusion, hello Wall Street Consensus
Weaponised interdependence in a bipolar world
Digital corporate autonomy
The new security grey zone
The rise and fall of the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment
Serving the national on the global plane
The EU global gateway and energy infrastructure
Infrastructural Power and the State in the Age of Geoeconomic Competition
Die neue globale Geoökonomie
Geoökonomie als Ende des Neoliberalismus
The EU as a global actor in the geoeconomic age
China as a Catalyst of the European Union's Trade Defence Instruments
Trade Countermeasures for Breaches of International Law Outside the Wto
International Finance and the Return of Geopolitics
On the genealogy of geoeconomics
Changing preferences
Enter the trade war? European public opinion on trade restrictions against China
EU Geoeconomic Power in the Clean Energy Transition
The Geoeconomic Turn of the Single European Market? Conceptual Challenges and Empirical Trends
Geoeconomic Power Europe
From Liberalisation to Industrial Policy
Inside the European Union's Trade Machinery
Between Geopolitics and Political Economy
A Geoeconomic Fix? European Industrial Policy on Semiconductors Amidst Global Competition
An Evermore Geoeconomic European Union? Exploring Critical Perspectives for Future Research
From quiet to noisy politics
The EU Energy Transition in a Geopoliticizing World
Embedded developmentalism
Mapping the Characteristics of Foreign Investment Screening Mechanisms
Singing from the same song sheet
Why the West’s alternative to China’s international infrastructure financing is failing
Securitized political economy, investment regulation and business influence in a geoeconomic era
The Second Cold War
Geopolitics and the 'New' State Capitalism
Agents and opponents of neoliberal globalization
Carrots or sticks? Analyzing the application of US economic statecraft towards Latin American engagement with China
| Unique citing works | 78 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 13 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 76 |