Constraints and opportunities in adopting, adapting, and inventing

Bibliographic Data

ID23327520
AuthorsJohn D Mccarthy (University of America, corresponding author)
Year1996
Pages141-151
Publication date1996-01-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueComparative Perspectives on Social Movements (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/cbo9780511803987.008
OpenAlexW636594613
ISBN9780511803987
LanguageEN
Citations received105

Scholars of social movements have come to a quite broad consensus about the importance of mobilizing structures for understanding the trajectory of particular social movements and broader social movement cycles. The choices that activists make about how to more or less formally pursue change have consequences for their ability to raise material resources and mobilize dissident efforts, as well as for society-wide legitimacy – all of which can directly affect the chances that their common efforts will succeed. But these same scholars have just begun to account for the comparative historical variation in those structures across societies, across movements, and through time. As they make progress in doing so, we will be better able to generate perspectives that account for how mobilizing structural forms emerge and evolve; how they are chosen, combined, and adapted by social movement activists; and how they differentially affect particular movements as well as movement cycle trajectories. The concepts of political opportunity and strategic framing are, I believe, particularly useful in illuminating these processes. By mobilizing structures I mean those agreed upon ways of engaging in collective action which include particular “tactical repertoires,” particular “social movement organizational” forms, and “modular social movement repertoires.” I also mean to include the range of everyday life micromobilization structural social locations that are not aimed primarily at movement mobilization, but where mobilization may be generated: these include family units, friendship networks, voluntary associations, work units, and elements of the state structure itself. The encompassing scope of the mobilizing structures concept usefully aggregates all of these many varieties of enabling institutional configurations, allowing us to address their routine dynamics as well as their common reciprocal interrelationships with both political opportunity structures and framing processes.

Affect (linguistics) · Legitimacy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social movement · Sociology · Communication · Law · Political Conflict and Governance

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub