Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Burden of Knowledge and the “Death of the Renaissance Man”

Is Innovation Getting Harder?

Bibliographic Data

ID23340554
AuthorsBeau Fly Jones (0000-0001-9697-9388, Northwestern University, corresponding author), Benjamin F Jones
Year2009
Volume76
Issue1
Pages283-317
Publication date2009-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Review of Economic Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-6527 • E-ISSN: 1467-937X
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00531.x
OpenAlexW3124253902
LanguageEN
Citations received115
References cited22

This paper investigates a possibly fundamental aspect of technological progress. If knowledge accumulates as technology advances, then successive generations of innovators may face an increasing educational burden. Innovators can compensate through lengthening educational phases and narrowing expertise, but these responses come at the cost of reducing individual innovative capacities, with implications for the organization of innovative activity—a greater reliance on teamwork—and negative implications for growth. Building on this “burden of knowledge” mechanism, this paper first presents six facts about innovator behaviour. I show that age at first invention, specialization, and teamwork increase over time in a large micro-data set of inventors. Furthermore, in cross-section, specialization and teamwork appear greater in deeper areas of knowledge, while, surprisingly, age at first invention shows little variation across fields. A model then demonstrates how these facts can emerge in tandem. The theory further develops explicit implications for economic growth, providing an explanation for why productivity growth rates did not accelerate through the 20th century despite an enormous expansion in collective research effort. Upward trends in academic collaboration and lengthening doctorates, which have been noted in other research, can also be explained in this framework. The knowledge burden mechanism suggests that the nature of innovation is changing, with negative implications for long-run economic growth.

Art history · Economic history · Economics · Sociology · The Renaissance · Classics · Economic Growth and Productivity · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · History · Italy: Economic History and Contemporary Issues

  • Artificial intelligence in academic research

    Open Access•Alessandro Muscio, Sotaro Shibayama•Technology in Society•2026

  • Destructive creation, creative destruction, and the paradox of innovation science

    Open Access•Likun Cao, Ziwen Chen et al.•Sociology Compass•2022

  • Beyond borders

    Open Access•Elena Veretennik, Elena Shakina•Higher Education Quarterly•2024

  • The Rise of Research Teams

    Open Access•Beau Fly Jones, Benjamin F Jones•The Journal of Economic…•2021

  • Reciprocity in Book Reviewing among American, British and Canadian Academics

    Open Access•Julien Larregue, Philippe Mongeon et al.•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•2019

  • A Evolução Recente da Inteligência Artificial

    Open Access•José Paulo Zeetano Chahad, Tuffy Licciardi Issa•Ciência & Trópico•2024

  • London calling? Agglomeration economies in literature since 1700

    Open Access•Sara Mitchell•Journal of Urban Economics•2019

  • Superstar Extinction

    Pierre Azoulay, Joshua Graff Zivin et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2010

  • To Infinity and Beyond?—Toward a More Nuanced Approach to Creativity in the Pisa Creative Thinking Assessment Test

    Open Access•Andreia Valquaresma, Felipe Zamana•The Journal of Creative Behavior•2025

  • Changes in the demographics of American inventors, 1870–1940

    Open Access•Sarada Sarada, Michael J Andrews et al.•Explorations in Economic History•2019

  • Innovations contemporaines

    Michèle Debonneuil, David Encaoua•Revue française d économie•2014

  • Open Innovation in Science

    Marion Poetz, Susanne Beck et al.•Oxford Handbook of Open Innovation•2024

  • Empty Innovation

    Open Access•Olof Hallonsten•Empty Innovation•2023

  • Crowd science

    Open Access•Chiara Franzoni, Henry Sauermann•Research Policy•2014

  • Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing

    Daniel S Hamermesh•Journal of Economic Literature•2013

  • Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas

    Open Access•Yang Yang, Tanya Y Tian et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2022

  • Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology

    Open Access•Lingfei Wu, Dashun Wang et al.•Nature•2019

  • Do inventors talk to strangers? On proximity and collaborative knowledge creation

    Open Access•Riccardo Crescenzi, Max Nathan et al.•Research Policy•2016

  • Science of science

    Open Access•Santo Fortunato, Carl T Bergstrom et al.•Science•2018

  • Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact

    Open Access•Brian Uzzi, Mukherjee et al.•Science•2013

  • Patent Statistics as an Innovation Indicator

    Sadao Nagaoka, Kazuyuki Motohashi et al.•Handbook of the Economics of…•2010

  • Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time

    Open Access•Michael Park, E Leahey et al.•Nature•2023

  • The double‐edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation

    Open Access•Sarah Kaplan, Keyvan Vakili•Strategic Management Journal•2015

  • Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier

    Open Access•Kevin J Boudreau, Kevin Boudreau et al.•Management Science•2016

  • Do-It-Yourself or Do-It-Together

    Open Access•Emmanuelle Fauchart, Maya Bacache-Beauvallet et al.•Technovation•2022

  • Return migration and geography of innovation in MNEs

    Prithwiraj Choudhury•Journal of Economic Geography•2015

  • Bit by bit

    Open Access•Moritz Goldbeck•Journal of Economic Geography•2025

  • The contribution of academic inventors to regional technological diversification

    Open Access•Francesco Quatraro, Alessandra Scandura•Journal of Economic Geography•2024

  • Local labour tasks and patenting in US commuting zones

    Open Access•Marialuisa Divella, Alessia Lo Turco et al.•Journal of Economic Geography•2023

  • Melting pot

    Open Access•Ling Huang, Zhiyang Lin et al.•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•2025

  • Diversity, networks, and innovation

    Open Access•Alina Lungeanu, Ryan Whalen et al.•Network Science•2022

  • Scaling innovation

    Wenyue Cui, Jie Tang•Journal of Chinese Governance•2024

  • Open source software as digital platforms to innovate

    Open Access•Sergio G Petralia, Sergio Petralia•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•2025

  • Quantity or efficiency? The impact of AI adoption on firm innovation

    Open Access•Huifang Cheng, Shengbin Lin et al.•Socio-Economic Planning Sciences•2026

  • Hot streaks and disruptiveness in the career of scientists

    Open Access•Hongkan Chen, Lutz Bornmann et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • AI technology application and employee responsibility

    Open Access•Jing Wang, Zeyu Xing et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • Identifying interdisciplinary emergence in the science of science

    Open Access•Keungoui Kim, Dieter F Kogler et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Science’s greatest discoverers

    Open Access•Alexander Krauss•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Climbing up the ladder of abstraction

    Open Access•Haochuan Cui, Tiewei Li et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • Repeated collaboration of inventors across European regions

    Open Access•Gergő Tóth, Sándor Juhász et al.•European Planning Studies•2021

  • Productivity spillovers in endogenous coauthor networks

    Open Access•Wei Cheng•Empirical Economics•2022

  • Bye bye Ms. American Sci

    Open Access•Jamin D Speer•Economics of Education Review•2023

  • Turing Award elites revisited

    Open Access•Yinyu Jin, Sha Yuan et al.•Scientometrics•2021

  • Making the most of world talent for science? The Nobel Prize and Fields Medal experience

    Open Access•Juan Gabriel Rodríguez•Scientometrics•2022

  • Popper’s probability calculus and the decline of scientific disruptiveness

    Open Access•Lutz Bornmann, Russell J Funk•Scientometrics•2025

  • Does research collaboration influence the “disruption” of articles? Evidence from neurosciences

    Open Access•Dongqing Lyu, Kaile Gong et al.•Scientometrics•2021

  • Interpretable XGBoost-SHAP machine learning model for identifying scientific breakthroughs

    Open Access•Libo Sheng, Xuanmin Ruan et al.•Scientometrics•2025

  • Does SSH–STEM interdisciplinarity promote scientific disruption

    Open Access•Shitao Hu, Yundong Xie et al.•Scientometrics•2026

  • A review on the novelty measurements of academic papers

    Open Access•Yi Zhao, Chengzhi Zhang•Scientometrics•2025

  • Unveiling the dynamics of team age structure and its impact on scientific innovation

    Open Access•Alex J Yang, Huimin Xu et al.•Scientometrics•2024

  • One capability, many outcomes

    Open Access•Liyun Hu, Zhaopeng Li et al.•Scientometrics•2026

  • On the causes and ramifications of multi-authorship in science

    Open Access•Vadim Y Kuperman, Gerald H Sokol•Scientometrics•2024

  • Examining the role of co-first authorship in scientific collaboration

    Open Access•Tian-Yuan Huang, Tianyuan Huang et al.•Scientometrics•2025

  • The association between prior knowledge and the disruption of an article

    Open Access•Libo Sheng, Dongqing Lyu et al.•Scientometrics•2023

  • Continued collaboration shortens the transition period of scientists who move to another institution

    Open Access•Liyin Zhang, Yuchen Qian et al.•Scientometrics•2023

  • Highly skilled and well connected

    Open Access•Diego Useche, Ernest Miguelez et al.•Journal of International Business…•2020

  • Digging deep or scratching the surface? Contingent innovation outcomes of seeking advice from geographically distant ties

    Open Access•Barthélemy Chollet, Karine Revet•Technological Forecasting and…•2023

  • Quantifying the knowledge proximity between academic and industry research

    Open Access•Hongye Zhao, Yi Zhao et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2026

  • How to search for literature in systematic reviews and meta-analyses

    Open Access•Michael Gusenbauer, Sebastian Peter Gauster•Technological Forecasting and…•2025

  • Citations or dollars? Early signals of a firm’s research success

    Open Access•Shuqi Xu, Manuel Sebastian Mariani et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • Extensive growth of inventions

    Open Access•Jieshu Wang, J Lobo•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • Women in top management teams and their impact on innovation

    Open Access•Jangwook Lee, Jiyoon Chung•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • Stimulating spin-outs and stalled subsequent technological development

    Open Access•Hiroshi Shimizu, Naohiko Wakutsu•Technological Forecasting and…•2026

  • Growth contributions of technological change

    Open Access•Chris W Callaghan•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Accelerating social science knowledge production with the coordinated open-source model

    Open Access•Konrad Turek•Quality & Quantity•2025

  • Spatial skill concentration agglomeration economies

    Open Access•Philipp Ehrl, Leonardo Monteiro Monastério•Journal of Regional Science•2021

  • Do labour market outcomes influence why women are underrepresented in engineering

    Open Access•Marı́a Arrazola, Raquel Campos et al.•Higher Education•2026

  • Global research collaborations of the United Kingdom in the post-Brexit era

    Open Access•Yusuf Ikbal Oldac, Francisco Olivos•Higher Education•2025

  • An empirical analysis of the relationship between innovation activities and job satisfaction among French firms

    Open Access•Gilles Grolleau, Naoufel Mzoughi et al.•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2022

  • Gender differences in the patterns and consequences of changing research directions in scientific careers

    Open Access•Lin Zhang, Fan Qi et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2024

  • On the shoulders of fallen giants

    Open Access•Seokkyun Woo, John P Walsh•Quantitative Science Studies•2024

  • Interdisciplinary research in artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Diletta Abbonato, Stefano Bianchini et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2024

  • The dominance of big teams in China’s scientific output

    Open Access•Linlin Liu, Jianfei Yu et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2021

  • Identifying patterns of countries’ industrial diversification

    Open Access•Nava Simaee, Sepehr Ghazinoory et al.•The Extractive Industries and…•2023

  • Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration

    Open Access•Laurent Bergé, Laurent R Bergé•Papers of the Regional Science…•2016

  • Imitation versus innovation in an aging society

    Open Access•James B Ang, Jakob B Madsen•Journal of Population Economics•2014

  • Expanding STEM education in low- and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Iyoma Priyadarshana•International Journal of…•2026

  • Solidarity in STEM

    Open Access•Ashley A Niler, Raquel Asencio et al.•Sex Roles•2019

  • How does mortality affect innovative activity in the long run

    Open Access•Dierk Herzer•World Development•2019

  • Global Mobile Inventors

    Open Access•Dany Bahar, Prithwiraj Choudhury et al.•Journal of Development Economics•2024

  • Humanistic Engineering

    Open Access•Matthew L Bolton•IEEE Technology and Society…•2022

  • Why China Has Not Caught Up Yet

    Open Access•Andrea Gilli, Mauro Gilli•International Security•2019

  • Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find

    Nena Bloom, Nicholas Bloom et al.•American Economic Review•2020

  • University Innovation and Local Economic Growth

    Naomi Hausman•The Review of Economics and…•2022

  • The Impact of Covid-19 on Productivity

    Nena Bloom, Nicholas Bloom et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2025

  • A Field Experiment on Search Costs and the Formation of Scientific Collaborations

    Kevin J Boudreau, Kevin Boudreau et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2017

  • When Distance Disappears

    Paola Giuri, Myriam Mariani•The Review of Economics and…•2013

  • Education and Invention

    Otto Toivanen, Lotta Väänänen•The Review of Economics and…•2016

  • Subway, Collaborative Matching, and Innovation

    Yumi Koh, Jing Li et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2025

  • Age and Great Invention

    Beau Fly Jones, Benjamin F Jones•The Review of Economics and…•2010

  • The Diffusion of the Internet and the Increased Propensity of Teams to Transcend Institutional and National Borders

    Anne E Winkler, Wolfgang Glänzel et al.•Revue économique•2015

  • The geography of duplicated inventions

    Stefano Horst Baruffaldi, Stefano Baruffaldi et al.•Regional Studies•2017

  • Is More Science Really Less Science? The Scientization of Science, 1900–2020

    Open Access•David Baker, David P Baker et al.•Minerva•2025

  • Recipes and Economic Growth

    Charles I Jones•Journal of Political Economy•2023

  • Artificial intelligence and radical innovation

    Open Access•Nils Grashof, Alexander Kopka•Small Business Economics•2023

  • From independent inventor to inventor entrepreneur

    Open Access•Kevin A Miceli, Shirish Sundaresan et al.•Small Business Economics•2025

  • The interregional migration of human capital and its regional consequences

    Alessandra Faggian, Isha Rajbhandari et al.•Regional Studies•2017

  • The scientific and technological interdisciplinary research of government research institutes

    Yoonjung Jung, Euiseok Kim et al.•Policy Studies•2021

  • Why are some regions more innovative than others? The role of small firms in the presence of large labs

    Ajay Agrawal, Iain Cockburn et al.•Journal of Urban Economics•2014

  • Collaboration and connectivity

    Open Access•Thor Berger, Erik Prawitz•Journal of Urban Economics•2024

  • The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States.

    Fritz Machlup•The production and distribution…•1962

  • Research, Patenting, and Technological Change

    Samuel Kortum, Samuel S Kortum•Econometrica•1997

  • Recombinant Growth

    M L Weitzman•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1998

  • The NBER Patent Citation Data File

    Bronwyn H Hall, Bronwyn Hall et al.•National Bureau of Economic…•2001

  • Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention

    Kenneth J Arrow•Rate and Direction of Inventive…•1962

  • Time Series Tests of Endogenous Growth Models

    C I Jones•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1995

  • The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge

    Open Access•Stefan Wuchty, Beau Fly Jones et al.•Science•2007

  • Age and Great Invention

    Beau Fly Jones, Benjamin F Jones•The Review of Economics and…•2010

  • A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction

    Philippe Aghion, Peter Howitt•Econometrica•1992

  • Public records—access, privacy, and public policy

    Open Access•Robert Gellman•Government Information Quarterly•1995

  • Growth without Scale Effects

    Alwyn Young•Journal of Political Economy•1998

  • R & D-Based Models of Economic Growth

    Charles I Jones•Journal of Political Economy•1995

  • The Production of Human Capital and the Life Cycle of Earnings

    Yoram Ben-Porath•Journal of Political Economy•1967

  • Debt, Deficits, and Finite Horizons

    Olivier Blanchard, Olivier J Blanchard•Journal of Political Economy•1985

  • Endogenous Technological Change

    Paul M Romer, Paul Romer•Journal of Political Economy•1990

  • Standing on the Shoulders of Giants

    Open Access•Suzanne Scotchmer•The Journal of Economic…•1991

  • R&D, Patents, and Productivity

    Irwin Feller, Zvi Griliches•Technology and Culture•1987

Unique citing works115
Citations per year7,19
Citation span2010 - 2026 (17)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 105

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae