Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation

Bibliographic Data

ID23344723
AuthorsJian Wang (0000-0001-6128-1254, Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume94
Issue3
Pages851-872
Publication date2013-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScientometrics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0138-9130 • E-ISSN: 1588-2861
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9
OpenAlexW1972230306
LanguageEN
Citations received61
References cited29

Citation · Citation analysis · Citation impact · Data science · Field (mathematics) · Information retrieval · Library science · Meta-analysis · Normalization (sociology) · Social science · Sociology · Statistics · Web of science · Computer Science · Mathematics · Medicine · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • What counts as aesthetics in science? A bibliometric analysis and visualization of the scientific literature from 1970 to 2018

    Manuel Anglada-Tort, Martin Skov•Psychology of Aesthetics…•2022

  • El profesional de la información (EPI)

    Open Access•José-Ricardo López-Robles, José Ricardo López-Robles et al.•El Profesional de la Informacion•2019

  • The Citation Impact of German Sociology Journals

    L Leydesdorff, Staša Milojević•Soziale Welt•2015

  • The impact of a national research assessment on the publications of sociologists in Italy

    Open Access•Aliakbar Akbaritabar, G Bravo et al.•Science and Public Policy•2021

  • Bias against novelty in science

    Open Access•Jian Wang, Reinhilde Veugelers et al.•Research Policy•2017

  • A review of the literature on citation impact indicators

    Open Access•Ludo Waltman•Journal of Informetrics•2016

  • Interdisciplinarity and Impact

    Open Access•Jian Wang, Bart Thijs et al.•PLoS ONE•2015

  • Years at Knowledge-Based Systems

    Open Access•Manuel J Cobo, M Ángeles Martínez et al.•Knowledge-Based Systems•2015

  • Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science

    Open Access•Qing Ke, Emilio Ferrara et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2015

  • Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics

    Open Access•Lutz Bornmann•Journal of Informetrics•2014

  • Data Mining in Healthcare

    Open Access•Maikel Luis Kolling, Leonardo Bertolin Furstenau et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Thirty Years of Human Rights Study in the Web of Science Database (1990–2020)

    Open Access•Priscilla Paola Severo, Leonardo Bertolin Furstenau et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • The use of linear models in quantitative research

    Open Access•Andrés Felipe Castro Torres, Aliakbar Akbaritabar•Quantitative Science Studies•2024

  • Evaluating the impact of interdisciplinary research

    Open Access•Elisa Omodei, Manlio De Domenico et al.•Network Science•2016

  • The relationship between interdisciplinarity and citation impact—a novel perspective on citation accumulation

    Open Access•Xiaojing Cai, Xiaozan Lyu et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • Evaluating the quality of tourism research using ChatGPT

    Mike Thelwall, Robin Nunkoo•Current Issues in Tourism•2025

  • Thirty‐five years of the Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

    Open Access•Ahmet Oğuz Aktürk•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2022

  • Percentile and stochastic-based approach to the comparison of the number of citations of articles indexed in different bibliographic databases

    Open Access•Gerson Pech, Catarina Delgado•Scientometrics•2020

  • Investigating the journal impact along the columns and rows of the publication-citation matrix

    Open Access•Hui Fang•Scientometrics•2020

  • Two sides of the same coin? Citation obsolescence and impact of different publication types and subject fields

    Open Access•Pei-Shan Chi, Wolfgang Glänzel•Scientometrics•2024

  • Interdisciplinarity and impact

    Open Access•Shiji Chen, Song Yanhui et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • Research evaluation with ChatGPT

    Open Access•Mike Thelwall, Zeyneb Kurt•Scientometrics•2025

  • Combining referenced publication year spectroscopy and topic clustering to identify key knowledge foundations in scientometrics

    Open Access•Cheng Wei, Wei Cheng et al.•Scientometrics•2025

  • Do researchers from prestigious universities deserve advantages in research funding? Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China

    Open Access•Shuwen Wang, Minglu Li et al.•Scientometrics•2025

  • Relevance of document types in the scores’ calculation of a specific field-normalized indicator

    Open Access•Robin Haunschild, Lutz Bornmann•Scientometrics•2022

  • Benchmarking research performance in a post-Soviet science system

    Open Access•Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo et al.•Scientometrics•2025

  • Partner diversity and post-project effort in achieving scientific novelty and impact

    Open Access•C S Park, Chaewon Park et al.•Scientometrics•2026

  • Alternative medicines worth researching? Citation analyses of acupuncture, chiropractic, homeopathy, and osteopathy 1996–2017

    Open Access•Mike Thelwall•Scientometrics•2021

  • Studying the accumulation velocity of altmetric data tracked by Altmetric.com

    Open Access•Zhichao Fang, Rodrigo Costas Comesana•Scientometrics•2020

  • Does the citation period have any effect on the informative value of selected citation indicators in research evaluations

    Open Access•Marcel Clermont, Johanna Krolak et al.•Scientometrics•2021

  • Unveiling the dynamics of team age structure and its impact on scientific innovation

    Open Access•Alex J Yang, Huimin Xu et al.•Scientometrics•2024

  • Saudi Arabia research

    Open Access•Hamdi A Al-Jamimi, Galal M BinMakhashen et al.•Scientometrics•2023

  • Comparison of citation impact between pre-and post-publication peer-selected best papers

    Open Access•Yongzhen Wang•Scientometrics•2024

  • A flexible functional method for jointly valuing journal visibility and author citation count

    Open Access•M Ryan Haley, M Kevin McGee•Scientometrics•2023

  • An integrated indicator for evaluating scientific papers

    Open Access•Zhaoping Yan, Kaiyu Fan•Scientometrics•2024

  • Encoding the citation life-cycle

    Open Access•Zhenyu Gou, Fan Meng et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • Medical articles in questionable journals are less impactful than those in non-questionable journals but still extensively cited

    Open Access•Dimity Stephen•Scientometrics•2023

  • Contrasting cross-correlation

    Open Access•Dimity Stephen, Stephan Stahlschmidt•Scientometrics•2024

  • Orcid-linked labeled data for evaluating author name disambiguation at scale

    Open Access•Jinseok Kim, Jason Owen-Smith•Scientometrics•2021

  • A comparison of systematic reviews and guideline-based systematic reviews in medical studies

    Open Access•Alexander Schniedermann•Scientometrics•2021

  • A matter of time

    Open Access•Weishu Liu•Scientometrics•2021

  • Are successful co-authors more important than first authors for publishing academic journal articles

    Open Access•Mike Thelwall•Scientometrics•2023

  • Matthew effects in science and the serial diffusion of ideas

    Open Access•Rudolf Farys, T Wolbring•Quantitative Science Studies•2021

  • Informed peer review for publication assessments

    Open Access•Giovanni Abramo, Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • Female-led teams produce more innovative ideas yet receive less scientific impact

    Open Access•Alex J Yang, Ying Ding et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2024

  • Scientometric engineering

    Open Access•Keisuke Okamura•Quantitative Science Studies•2022

  • How can citation impact in bibliometrics be normalized? A new approach combining citing-side normalization and citation percentiles

    Open Access•Lutz Bornmann•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • On the topicality and research impact of special issues

    Open Access•Maxime Sainte-Marie, Philippe Mongeon et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • Implicit and explicit research quality score probabilities from ChatGPT

    Open Access•Mike Thelwall, Yunhan Yang•Quantitative Science Studies•2025

  • Gender differences in citation impact for 27 fields and six English-speaking countries 1996–2014

    Open Access•Mike Thelwall•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • Reproducible science of science at scale

    Open Access•Alexander J Gates, Albert-László Barabási•Quantitative Science Studies•2023

  • Is research funding always beneficial? A cross-disciplinary analysis of U.K. research 2014–20

    Open Access•Mike Thelwall, Kayvan Kousha et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2023

  • Publication patterns in the humanities

    Open Access•Nicolás Robinson-García, Wenceslao Arroyo-Machado et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • Revistas españolas de Documentación en Web of Science

    Open Access•Javier Guallar, José-Ricardo López-Robles et al.•El Profesional de la Informacion•2020

  • A global south strategy for evaluating research value with ChatGPT

    Open Access•Robin Nunkoo, Mike Thelwall•Quantitative Science Studies•2026

  • Extrinsic drivers of scientific impact in second language assessment

    Open Access•Sai Zhang, Vahid Aryadoust•Language Testing•2026

  • Demography's Changing Intellectual Landscape

    Open Access•M Giovanna Merli, J Moody et al.•Demography•2023

  • The public relevance of philosophy

    Open Access•Stijn Conix, Olivier Lemeire et al.•Synthese•2022

  • Waypoints for Evaluating Big Science

    Open Access•William T Bianco, William Bianco et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2017

  • Prevalence and scholarly impact of observational versus experimental research in health psychology and behavioral medicine

    Open Access•Paschal Sheeran, Yifei Pei et al.•Annals of Behavioral Medicine•2025

  • Years of Workplace Diversity Research in Hospitality and Tourism

    Open Access•Zohre Mohammadi, Abhishek Bhati et al.•Equal Opportunities International•2023

  • Sleeping Beauties in science

    Open Access•Anthony F J van Raan•Scientometrics•2004

  • Characteristics of highly cited papers

    Dag W Aksnes•Research Evaluation•2003

  • Universality of citation distributions

    Open Access•Filippo Radicchi, Santo Fortunato et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2008

  • The scientific impact of nations

    Open Access•David A King•Nature•2004

  • Citation Analysis

    Open Access•Alan L Porter•Social Studies of Science•1977

Unique citing works61
Citations per year5,08
Citation span2014 - 2026 (13)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 58

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae