Crop losses to pests
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23344749 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erich-Christian Oerke (0000-0003-3107-1031, University of Bonn, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 144 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 31-43 |
| Publication date | 2006-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Agricultural Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-8596 • E-ISSN: 1469-5146 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0021859605005708 |
| OpenAlex | W2035759078 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 63 |
Productivity of crops grown for human consumption is at risk due to the incidence of pests, especially weeds, pathogens and animal pests. Crop losses due to these harmful organisms can be substantial and may be prevented, or reduced, by crop protection measures. An overview is given on different types of crop losses as well as on various methods of pest control developed during the last century. Estimates on potential and actual losses despite the current crop protection practices are given for wheat, rice, maize, potatoes, soybeans, and cotton for the period 2001–03 on a regional basis (19 regions) as well as for the global total. Among crops, the total global potential loss due to pests varied from about 50% in wheat to more than 80% in cotton production. The responses are estimated as losses of 26–29% for soybean, wheat and cotton, and 31, 37 and 40% for maize, rice and potatoes, respectively. Overall, weeds produced the highest potential loss (34%), with animal pests and pathogens being less important (losses of 18 and 16%). The efficacy of crop protection was higher in cash crops than in food crops. Weed control can be managed mechanically or chemically, therefore worldwide efficacy was considerably higher than for the control of animal pests or diseases, which rely heavily on synthetic chemicals. Regional differences in efficacy are outlined. Despite a clear increase in pesticide use, crop losses have not significantly decreased during the last 40 years. However, pesticide use has enabled farmers to modify production systems and to increase crop productivity without sustaining the higher losses likely to occur from an increased susceptibility to the damaging effect of pests. The concept of integrated pest/crop management includes a threshold concept for the application of pest control measures and reduction in the amount/frequency of pesticides applied to an economically and ecologically acceptable level. Often minor crop losses are economically acceptable; however, an increase in crop productivity without adequate crop protection does not make sense, because an increase in attainable yields is often associated with an increased vulnerability to damage inflicted by pests.
Agriculture · Agronomy · Biology · Cash crop · Crop · Crop Productivity · Crop protection · Crop yield · Integrated pest management · Livestock · PEST analysis · Pest control · Pesticide · Productivity · Ecology · Insect Pest Control Strategies · Insect Resistance and Genetics · Nematode management and characterization studies · Toxicology
Protecting While Promoting? The Limits of Agroindustry‐Driven Pesticide Safety in Ugandan Smallholder Agriculture
Understanding interactions and relationships in pest management innovation processes in Bangladesh
From local to central
Causes and Consequences of Increasing Herbicide Use in Mali
Global Environment Outlook – GEO-6
Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification
Resilience in Agriculture through Crop Diversification
Soil and the intensification of agriculture for global food security
Defaunation in the Anthropocene
Changes of crop failure risks in the United States associated with large-scale climate oscillations in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans
Understanding the combined impacts of weeds and climate change on crops
Systematic mapping shows the need for increased socio-ecological research on oil palm
Assessing long-distance atmospheric transport of soilborne plant pathogens
Ecological illiteracy can deepen farmers’ pesticide dependency
Higher landscape diversity associated with improved crop production resilience in Kansas-USA
Making farming more sustainable by helping farmers to decide rather than telling them what to do
Stochastically modeling the projected impacts of climate change on rainfed and irrigated US crop yields
Interventions for sourcing EAT-Lancet diets within national agricultural areas
Weighing consequences of action and inaction in invasive insect management
Crop yields are not greater outside centers of origin
Weeds in a changing climate
Empowering farmers through science communication
Acute health symptoms related to perception and practice of pesticides use among farmers from all regions of Thailand
Towards a landscape-metabolism model for the tropical Andes. Application in the metropolitan region of Cali (Colombia)
The spatio-temporal dynamics of pesticide use
Drivers and barriers in the consumption of alternative staples. A systematic literature review and future research agenda
The Monumental Mistake of Evicting Bats from Archaeological Sites—A Reflection from New Delhi
Ecological shocks and children’s school attendance and farm work in Ghana
The value of existing regulatory frameworks for the environmental risk assessment of agricultural pest control using gene drives
A multi-level and multi-actor approach to risk governance
Enhancing Sustainable Development Through Interdisciplinary Collaboration
National leverage points to reduce global pesticide pollution
The Herbicide Revolution in Developing Countries
Making differences legible
Modelling the Effects of a Glyphosate Ban on Weed Management in Silage Maize Production
The Expansion of Modern Agriculture and Global Biodiversity Decline
Designing agri-environmental schemes to cope with uncertainty
Changing the understanding of crop production
Food for thought
Agricultural pesticides and land use intensification in high, middle and low income countries
Pesticide-free but not organic
Can plant clinics enhance judicious use of pesticides? Evidence from Rwanda and Zambia
Plant clinics, farm performance and poverty alleviation
The gendered dimensions of an ‘herbicide revolution’
The role of culture on pest management innovation; a comparative analysis of two farmer communities in Bangladesh
The costs of human-induced evolution in an agricultural system
Mitigating crop yield losses through weed diversity
Anticipating complexity in the deployment of gene drive insects in agriculture
The use of crop diversification in agricultural yield insurance products
Land‐sharing/‐sparing connectivity landscapes for ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation
Combining social, ecological and economic approaches in knowledge co‐production enables the identification of sustainable farming options
Integration of indigenous knowledge with scientific knowledge
Towards the institutionalization of ethics
Under- and over-use of pesticides
Landscape-level feedbacks in the demand for transgenic pesticidal corn in the Philippines
Revisiting Pesticide Taxation Schemes
The use of Clausena anisata in insect pest control in Africa
Attitudes of a farming community towards urban growth and rural fragmentation—An Auckland case study
Waterfowl foraging in winter-flooded ricefields
A shared socio-economic pathway based framework for characterising future emissions of chemicals to the natural environment
Feeding everyone
Refining pesticide use to reduce yield loss
An Approach to Understand Rural Advisory Services in a Decentralised Setting
| Unique citing works | 63 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,2 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 59 |