Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Crop losses to pests

Bibliographic Data

ID23344749
AuthorsErich-Christian Oerke (0000-0003-3107-1031, University of Bonn, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume144
Issue1
Pages31-43
Publication date2006-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Agricultural Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-8596 • E-ISSN: 1469-5146
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0021859605005708
OpenAlexW2035759078
LanguageEN
Citations received63

Productivity of crops grown for human consumption is at risk due to the incidence of pests, especially weeds, pathogens and animal pests. Crop losses due to these harmful organisms can be substantial and may be prevented, or reduced, by crop protection measures. An overview is given on different types of crop losses as well as on various methods of pest control developed during the last century. Estimates on potential and actual losses despite the current crop protection practices are given for wheat, rice, maize, potatoes, soybeans, and cotton for the period 2001–03 on a regional basis (19 regions) as well as for the global total. Among crops, the total global potential loss due to pests varied from about 50% in wheat to more than 80% in cotton production. The responses are estimated as losses of 26–29% for soybean, wheat and cotton, and 31, 37 and 40% for maize, rice and potatoes, respectively. Overall, weeds produced the highest potential loss (34%), with animal pests and pathogens being less important (losses of 18 and 16%). The efficacy of crop protection was higher in cash crops than in food crops. Weed control can be managed mechanically or chemically, therefore worldwide efficacy was considerably higher than for the control of animal pests or diseases, which rely heavily on synthetic chemicals. Regional differences in efficacy are outlined. Despite a clear increase in pesticide use, crop losses have not significantly decreased during the last 40 years. However, pesticide use has enabled farmers to modify production systems and to increase crop productivity without sustaining the higher losses likely to occur from an increased susceptibility to the damaging effect of pests. The concept of integrated pest/crop management includes a threshold concept for the application of pest control measures and reduction in the amount/frequency of pesticides applied to an economically and ecologically acceptable level. Often minor crop losses are economically acceptable; however, an increase in crop productivity without adequate crop protection does not make sense, because an increase in attainable yields is often associated with an increased vulnerability to damage inflicted by pests.

Agriculture · Agronomy · Biology · Cash crop · Crop · Crop Productivity · Crop protection · Crop yield · Integrated pest management · Livestock · PEST analysis · Pest control · Pesticide · Productivity · Ecology · Insect Pest Control Strategies · Insect Resistance and Genetics · Nematode management and characterization studies · Toxicology

  • Protecting While Promoting? The Limits of Agroindustry‐Driven Pesticide Safety in Ugandan Smallholder Agriculture

    Open Access•Elina Andersson, Ellinor Isgren et al.•Journal of Agrarian Change•2026

  • Understanding interactions and relationships in pest management innovation processes in Bangladesh

    Zannatun Mukta, Most Zannatun Nahar Mukta•2020

  • From local to central

    Open Access•Ryan R J Mcallister, Catherine J Robinson et al.•Conservation Ecology•2015

  • Causes and Consequences of Increasing Herbicide Use in Mali

    Open Access•Steve Haggblade, Steven Haggblade et al.•European Journal of Development…•2017

  • Global Environment Outlook – GEO-6

    Open Access•Detlef P Van Vuuren, U N UN Environment et al.•Global Environment Outlook - GEO-6•2019

  • Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification

    Open Access•Teja Tscharntke, Yann Clough et al.•Biological Conservation•2012

  • Resilience in Agriculture through Crop Diversification

    Brenda B Lin•BioScience•2011

  • Soil and the intensification of agriculture for global food security

    Open Access•Peter M Kopittke, Neal W Menzies et al.•Environment International•2019

  • Defaunation in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Rodolfo Dirzo, Hillary S Young et al.•Science•2014

  • Changes of crop failure risks in the United States associated with large-scale climate oscillations in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans

    Open Access•Tayler Schillerberg, Di Tian•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Understanding the combined impacts of weeds and climate change on crops

    Open Access•Montserrat Vilà, Evelyn M Beaury et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Systematic mapping shows the need for increased socio-ecological research on oil palm

    Open Access•Valentine Joy Reiss-Woolever, Sarah H Luke et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Assessing long-distance atmospheric transport of soilborne plant pathogens

    Open Access•Hayes Klemm Brodsky, Rocío Calderón et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2023

  • Ecological illiteracy can deepen farmers’ pesticide dependency

    Open Access•Kris A G Wyckhuys, K L Heong et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • Higher landscape diversity associated with improved crop production resilience in Kansas-USA

    Open Access•Katherine S Nelson, Buddhika Patalee et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Making farming more sustainable by helping farmers to decide rather than telling them what to do

    Open Access•Roland Kröbel, Emma C Stephens et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Stochastically modeling the projected impacts of climate change on rainfed and irrigated US crop yields

    Open Access•Xiao Zhu, Tara J Troy et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • Interventions for sourcing EAT-Lancet diets within national agricultural areas

    Open Access•Nicolas Navarre, Maarten Schrama et al.•One Earth•2023

  • Weighing consequences of action and inaction in invasive insect management

    Open Access•Paul K Abram, Michelle T Franklin et al.•One Earth•2024

  • Crop yields are not greater outside centers of origin

    Open Access•Justin D Stewart, E Toby Kiers et al.•One Earth•2025

  • Weeds in a changing climate

    Open Access•Marie J Zwetsloot, Marie‐Charlotte Bopp et al.•PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET•2026

  • Empowering farmers through science communication

    Open Access•Shahbaz Aslam, Babar Hussain et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2025

  • Acute health symptoms related to perception and practice of pesticides use among farmers from all regions of Thailand

    Open Access•B Brijnath, Nalin Sittitoon et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • Towards a landscape-metabolism model for the tropical Andes. Application in the metropolitan region of Cali (Colombia)

    Open Access•María José La Rota-Aguilera, María José LaRota-Aguilera et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2023

  • The spatio-temporal dynamics of pesticide use

    Kassoum Ayouba, Andrés Vallone•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2023

  • Drivers and barriers in the consumption of alternative staples. A systematic literature review and future research agenda

    Open Access•Priya Shah, Amandeep Dhir et al.•British Food Journal•2021

  • The Monumental Mistake of Evicting Bats from Archaeological Sites—A Reflection from New Delhi

    Open Access•Ravi Umadi, Sumit Dookia et al.•Heritage•2019

  • Ecological shocks and children’s school attendance and farm work in Ghana

    Open Access•Emmanuel Martey, Prince Maxwell Etwire et al.•World Development Perspectives•2023

  • The value of existing regulatory frameworks for the environmental risk assessment of agricultural pest control using gene drives

    Open Access•James Romeis, Jörg Romeis et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2020

  • A multi-level and multi-actor approach to risk governance

    Open Access•Alfons Oude Lansink, Michelle Schut et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2016

  • Enhancing Sustainable Development Through Interdisciplinary Collaboration

    Open Access•Magdalena Daria Vaverková, Joanna Polak et al.•Sustainable Development•2024

  • National leverage points to reduce global pesticide pollution

    Open Access•David Wuepper, Fiona H M Tang et al.•Global Environmental Change•2022

  • The Herbicide Revolution in Developing Countries

    Open Access•Steve Haggblade, Steven Haggblade et al.•European Journal of Development…•2017

  • Making differences legible

    Open Access•Sandrine Allain, Nicolas Salliou•Ecological Economics•2021

  • Modelling the Effects of a Glyphosate Ban on Weed Management in Silage Maize Production

    Open Access•Thomas Böcker, Wolfgang Britz et al.•Ecological Economics•2017

  • The Expansion of Modern Agriculture and Global Biodiversity Decline

    Open Access•Bruno Lanz, Simon Dietz et al.•Ecological Economics•2017

  • Designing agri-environmental schemes to cope with uncertainty

    Open Access•Margaux Lapierre, Gwenolé Le Velly et al.•Ecological Economics•2022

  • Changing the understanding of crop production

    Open Access•Anne Dietrich, Anne Sophie Dietrich et al.•Ecological Economics•2025

  • Food for thought

    Open Access•Michael S Jones, Zachary Brown•Food Policy•2023

  • Agricultural pesticides and land use intensification in high, middle and low income countries

    Open Access•Pepijn Schreinemachers, Prasnee Tipraqsa•Food Policy•2012

  • Pesticide-free but not organic

    Open Access•Niklas Möhring, R Finger•Food Policy•2021

  • Can plant clinics enhance judicious use of pesticides? Evidence from Rwanda and Zambia

    Open Access•Justice A Tambo, Dannie Romney et al.•Food Policy•2021

  • Plant clinics, farm performance and poverty alleviation

    Open Access•Justice A Tambo, Bellancile Uzayisenga et al.•World Development•2020

  • The gendered dimensions of an ‘herbicide revolution’

    Open Access•Carly E Nichols, Carly Nichols et al.•World Development•2026

  • The role of culture on pest management innovation; a comparative analysis of two farmer communities in Bangladesh

    Open Access•Most Zannatun Nahar Mukta, Annemarie Van Paassen et al.•Innovation and Development•2022

  • The costs of human-induced evolution in an agricultural system

    Open Access•Alexa Varah, Kwadjo Ahodo et al.•Nature Sustainability•2019

  • Mitigating crop yield losses through weed diversity

    Open Access•Guillaume Adeux, Eric Vieren et al.•Nature Sustainability•2019

  • Anticipating complexity in the deployment of gene drive insects in agriculture

    Open Access•Jennifer Baltzegar, Jessica Cavin Barnes et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2017

  • The use of crop diversification in agricultural yield insurance products

    Open Access•Jonas Schmitt, Frank Offermann et al.•Food Policy•2025

  • Land‐sharing/‐sparing connectivity landscapes for ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation

    Open Access•Ingo Grass, Jacqueline Loos et al.•People and Nature•2019

  • Combining social, ecological and economic approaches in knowledge co‐production enables the identification of sustainable farming options

    Open Access•Neema Robert Kinabo, Dominic A Martin et al.•People and Nature•2026

  • Integration of indigenous knowledge with scientific knowledge

    Open Access•Enioluwa Jonathan Ijatuyi, Alexa Lamm et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2025

  • Towards the institutionalization of ethics

    Open Access•Seyed Davood Hajimirrahimi, Rando Värnik et al.•Environment Development and…•2024

  • Under- and over-use of pesticides

    Open Access•Narishwar Ghimire, Richard T Woodward•Ecological Economics•2013

  • Landscape-level feedbacks in the demand for transgenic pesticidal corn in the Philippines

    Open Access•Zachary S Brown, Zachary Brown et al.•Ecological Economics•2021

  • Revisiting Pesticide Taxation Schemes

    Open Access•R Finger, Niklas Möhring et al.•Ecological Economics•2017

  • The use of Clausena anisata in insect pest control in Africa

    Open Access•Lillian Mukandiwa, Vinny Naidoo et al.•Journal of Ethnopharmacology•2016

  • Attitudes of a farming community towards urban growth and rural fragmentation—An Auckland case study

    Open Access•Fiona Curran-Cournane, Tiffany Cain et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Waterfowl foraging in winter-flooded ricefields

    Open Access•Anne Brogi, Claire A Pernollet et al.•AMBIO•2015

  • A shared socio-economic pathway based framework for characterising future emissions of chemicals to the natural environment

    Open Access•Alizée Desrousseaux, Alizée O S Desrousseaux et al.•Futures•2022

  • Feeding everyone

    Open Access•David C Denkenberger, David Denkenberger et al.•Futures•2015

  • Refining pesticide use to reduce yield loss

    Open Access•Hangyu Zhang, Yujing Song et al.•Food Policy•2026

  • An Approach to Understand Rural Advisory Services in a Decentralised Setting

    Open Access•Julien Lamontagne-Godwin, Julien Lamontagne‐godwin et al.•Social Sciences•2019

Unique citing works63
Citations per year4,2
Citation span2011 - 2026 (16)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 59

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae