Assessor or assessee
How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 23368331 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Lan Li (0000-0002-0408-8615, Bowling Green State University, autor de correspondencia), Xiongyi Liu (0000-0001-5075-5629, Cleveland State University), Allen L Steckelberg (University of Nebraska–Lincoln) |
| Año | 2010 |
| Volumen | 41 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 525-536 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2010-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | British Journal of Educational Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0007-1013 • E-ISSN: 1467-8535 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x |
| OpenAlex | W2043311266 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 66 |
| Referencias citadas | 11 |
This study investigated the relationship between the quality of peer assessment and the quality of student projects in a technology application course for teacher education students. Forty‐three undergraduate student participants completed the assigned projects. During the peer assessment process, students first anonymously rated and commented on two randomly assigned peers' projects, and they were then asked to improve their projects based on the feedback they received. Two independent raters blindly evaluated student initial and final projects. Data analysis indicated that when controlling for the quality of the initial projects, there was a significant relationship between the quality of peer feedback students provided for others and the quality of the students' own final projects. However, no significant relationship was found between the quality of peer feedback students received and the quality of their own final projects. This finding supported a prior research claim that active engagement in reviewing peers' projects may facilitate student learning.
Higher education · Mathematics education · Medical education · Peer evaluation · Peer feedback · Peer review · Process (computing) · Quality (philosophy) · Computer Science · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Innovative Teaching Methods · Medicine · Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback
A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach to conducting scientific inquiry activities in a science park
Efectos de los tipos de feedback entre iguales en los trabajos escritos
Student peer review
The effect of peer assessment on project performance of students at different learning levels
The road to self-assessment
Peer-assessment in higher education – twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward
Peer-review in practice
The role of anonymity in peer assessment
Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment
The quality of written peer feedback on undergraduates’ draft answers to an assignment, and the use made of the feedback
Formative assessment in higher education
Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback
Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay
Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance
Peer reviewers learn from giving comments
Feedback sources in essay writing
Importance of Immediate Electronic-Based Feedback to Enhance Feedback for First-Time CPR Trainees
Evaluating Assessment in Moocs
The effects of generative AI -supported peer feedback on preservice teachers’ learning outcomes, feedback uptake, and critical thinking
An exploratory study of student perceptions of equity in peer assessment as part of independent group work
Safe and sound
Nature and Quality of Interactions Between Elementary School Children Using Video-Modeling and Peer-to-Peer Evaluation With and Without Structured Video Feedback
Engaging students via synchronous peer feedback in a technology-enhanced learning environment
The effects of role scripting strategies on students’ critical thinking development in online discussions
Online peer feedback patterns of success and failure in argumentative essay writing
Gender differences in students’ argumentative essay writing, peer review performance and uptake in online learning environments
An online collaborative peer-assessment approach to strengthening pre-service teachers’ digital content development competence and higher-order thinking tendency
Examining the hard, peer, and teacher scaffolding framework in inquiry-based technology-enhanced learning environments
Teaching Science as a Process, Not a Set of Facts
Enhancing primary teachers’ formative assessment literacy
AI assistance in peer feedback provision
Facilitating critical thinking in decision making-based professional training
Integration of the peer assessment approach with a virtual reality design system for learning earth science
Enhancing peer feedback provision through user interface scaffolding
Beyond small gains
Incorporation of peer‐feedback into the pedagogical use of spherical video‐based virtual reality in writing education
Incorporating AI and learning analytics to build trustworthy peer assessment systems
Enhancing Instruction through Constructivism, Cooperative Learning, and Cloud Computing
Interconnecting peer feedback literacy
The bilateral benefits of providing and receiving peer feedback in academic writing across varying L2 proficiency
How digital reflection and feedback environments contribute to pre-service teachers’ beliefs during a teaching practicum
A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates’ learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing
Learning from reviewing peers’ concept maps in an inquiry context
The effect of peer assessment on problem solving skills of prospective teachers supported by online learning activities
Online peer assessment in Galenic Pharmacy
Modifying an Introduction to Criminal Justice Course to Be Writing-Intensive
Promoting pre-service teachers' professional vision of classroom management during practical school training
Learning as a peer assessor
Making internal feedback explicit
Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis
Knowing me, knowing you
Effects of teacher, peer and self-feedback on student improvement in online assessment
Perspectives on peer-review
Giving or receiving feedback
Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment
A peer review model for supervised work Integrated learning assessment
Flipped small group classes and peer marking
Improvement in the quality of feedback as an indication of the development of evaluative judgement
Making internal feedback explicit
Factors influencing students’ peer feedback uptake
First-year undergraduate students’ perceptions of lecturer and peer feedback
Can a minimalistic tip sheet with a motivational focus foster high-quality, motivating peer-feedback? Results of two field experiments
Increasing anonymity in peer assessment by using classroom response technology within face-to-face higher education
What Is the Influence of Peer Feedback and Author Response on Chinese University Students’ English Writing Performance
How more-improvement and less-improvement groups differ in peer feedback giving and receiving practice-an exploratory study
Electronic Peer Feedback, EFL Academic Writing and Reflective Thinking
Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students
Peer and Teacher Assessment of the Oral and Written Tasks of a Group Project
An Examination of the Use of Peer Rating for Formative Assessment in the Context of the Theory of Consumption Values
The Importance of Marking Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment
Enhancing Critical Reading and Writing through Peer Reviews
Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities
Peer, self and tutor assessment
| Obras citantes distintas | 66 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2,87 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2003 - 2026 (24) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 56 |