Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Inflectional morphology

Bibliographic Data

ID23379554
AuthorsBalthasar Bickel (0000-0002-9087-0565, Leipzig University), J Nichols (0000-0002-3709-1861, University of California, Berkeley)
Year2007
Pages169-240
Publication date2007-10-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueLanguage Typology and Syntactic Description (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/cbo9780511618437.003
OpenAlexW1579728765
ISBN9780511618437
LanguageEN
Citations received94

Introduction The prototypical inflectional categories include number, tense, person, case, gender, and others, all of which usually produce different forms of the same word rather than different words. Thus leaf and leaves , or write and writes , or run and ran are not given separate headwords in dictionaries. Derivational categories, in contrast, do form separate words, so that leaflet , writer , and rerun will figure as separate words in dictionaries. In addition, inflectional categories do not in general alter the basic meaning expressed by a word; they merely add specifications to a word or emphasize certain aspects of its meaning. Leaves , for instance, has the same basic meaning as leaf , but adds to this the specification of multiple exemplars of leaves. Derived words, by contrast, generally denote different concepts from their base: leaflet refers to different things from leaf ; and the noun writer calls up a somewhat different concept from the verb to write . That said, finding a watertight cross-linguistic definition of ‘inflectional’ which will let us classify every morphological category as either inflectional or derivational is not easy. Nor can ‘inflectional’ be defined simply by generalizing over attested inflectional systems or paradigms; the cross-linguistic variation in both forms and categories is too great. Rather, we define inflection as those categories of morphology that are regularly responsive to the grammatical environment in which they are expressed. Inflection differs from derivation in that derivation is a lexical matter in which choices are independent of the grammatical environment.

Contrast (vision) · Linguistics · Meaning (existential) · Natural language processing · Noun · Root (linguistics) · Verb · Word (group theory) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Lexicography and Language Studies · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Did Greek Influence the Coptic Preference for Prefixing? A Quantitative-Typological Perspective

    Open Access•Eitan Grossman•Journal of Language Contact•2018

  • The senses of illative and lative case in the Mordvin languages

    Open Access•Riku Erkkilä•Eesti ja soome-ugri keeleteaduse…•2022

  • The Historical Dynamics of Morphological Complexity in Trans-Himalayan

    Open Access•Scott Delancey•Linguistic Discovery•2015

  • The New Guinea Highlands evidentiality area

    Open Access•Lila San Roque, Robyn Loughnane•Linguistic Typology•2012

  • Are dislocated direct objects clause-external? Evidence from differential object marking

    Open Access•Giorgio Iemmolo•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•2012

  • Disjunctive ordering and French morphology

    Open Access•Yves-Charles Morin•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1988

  • Reconstructing the evolution of Indo-European grammar

    Open Access•Gerd Carling, Chundra Cathcart•Language•2021

  • The conjugation classes of Tilapa Otomi

    Open Access•Enrique L Palancar•Linguistics•2012

  • Languages Across Boundaries

    Dik Bakker, Martin Haspelmath•Languages Across Boundaries•2013

  • Evidentiality and Its Relations With Other Verbal Categories

    Diana Forker•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Dizque and other Emergent Evidential forms in Romance Languages

    Asier Alcázar•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality

    Kaspar Boye•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality in Nakh-Daghestanian Languages

    Diana Forker•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality in Japanese

    Heiko Narrog, Wenjiang Yang•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • The Interactional and Cultural Pragmatics of Evidentiality in Pastaza Quichua

    Janis B Nucholls•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality and Language Contact

    Alexandra Y Aikhenvald•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Where Do Evidentials Come From?

    Victor A Friedman•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality in the Languages of New Guinea

    Hannah Sarvasy, Hannah S Sarvasy•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality in Boran and Witotoan Languages

    Katarzyna I Wojtylak•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality in Formosan Languages

    Chia-Jung Pan•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidence and Evidentiality in Quechua Narrative Discourse

    Rosaleen Howard•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Stereotypes and Evidentiality

    Michael Wood•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality and Information Source in Signed Languages

    Wilcox, Sherman Wilcox et al.•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality in Bodic Languages

    Gwendoyn Hyslop•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Extragrammatical Expression of Information Source

    Mario Squartini•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality in Gitksan

    Thomas Peterson, Tyler Peterson•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality in Algonquian

    Marie-Odile Junker, Conor Quinn et al.•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentials and Epistemic Modality

    Björn Wiemer•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality and the Expression of Knowledge

    Anne Storch•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Non-Propositional Evidentiality

    Guillaume Jacques•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality in Nambikwara Languages

    David Eberhard, David M Eberhard•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentials, Information Sources, and Cognition

    Ercenur Ünal, Anna Papafragou•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality

    Alexandra Y Aikhenvald•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentials and Person

    Jackson T-S Sun•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality and the Cariban Languages

    Eithne B Carlin•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality in Tibetic

    Scott Delancey•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • The Reportative in the Languagesc of the Philippines

    Josephine Sanicas Daguman•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality in Korean

    Ho-Min Sohn, Ho‐min Sohn•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Turkic Indirectivity

    Lars Johanson•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • The Acquisition of Evidentiality

    Stanka A Fitneva•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality and Formal Semantic Theories

    Margaret Speas•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality in the Uto-Aztecan Languages

    Tim Thornes•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentiality in Tukanoan Languages

    Kristine Stenzel, Elsa Gomez-Imbert•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Caddo

    Wallace Chafe•Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis•2017

  • The Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis

    Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun et al.•Oxford Handbook of Polysynthesis•2017

  • Evidentiality in Mongolic

    Benjamin Brosig, Elena K Skribnik et al.•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • Evidentials in Uralic Languages

    Elena K Skribnik, Elena Skribnik et al.•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality

    Eithne B Carlin, A I͡U Aĭkhenvalʹd et al.•Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality•2018

  • The Typological Diversity of Morphomes

    Open Access•Borja Herce•Typological Diversity of Morphomes•2023

  • Associated motion in Manchu in typological perspective

    Open Access•Guillaume Jacques, José Andrés Alonso De La Fuente•Language and Linguistics 語言暨語言學•2018

  • A binary inflectional voice contrast in Mabaan (Western Nilotic)

    Open Access•Torben Andersen•Studies in Language•2023

  • Morphological structure can escape reduction effects from mass admixture of second language speakers

    Open Access•Manuel Widmer, Mathias Jenny et al.•Studies in Language•2020

  • Word-internal “thorn” clusters and the dative singular of the PIE 1 st person pronoun

    Svenja Bonmann•Historical Linguistics•2021

  • Pushing the boundaries

    Open Access•Nicholas Evans•Russian Journal of Linguistics•2022

  • R̥gvedic depictive adjectival compounds and their functions

    Open Access•P Widmer, Salvatore Scarlata•Journal of South Asian Languages…•2021

  • Rethinking subjecthood

    Francisca Toro Varela•Journal of Latin Linguistics•2025

  • Polyfunctional argument markers in Ket

    Open Access•Matthew Carter•Morphology•2023

  • Two-phase verbs

    Jurica Polančec•Language Typology and Universals•2021

  • Direction and associated motion in Tibeto-Burman

    Open Access•Carol Genetti, Kristine A Hildebrandt et al.•Linguistic Typology•2021

  • Trapped morphology and the rise of the Slavic definite adjective inflection

    Florian Wandl•Folia Linguistica•2022

  • From interactional to informative discourse

    Open Access•Ruhan Güçlü•Folia Linguistica•2026

  • A quantitative global test of the complexity trade-off hypothesis

    Open Access•Olena Shcherbakova, Volker Gast et al.•Linguistics Vanguard•2023

  • Head and dependent marking and dependency length in possessive noun phrases

    Open Access•Kaius Sinnemäki, Viljami Haakana•Linguistics Vanguard•2023

  • Discourse motivations for pronominal and zero objects across registers in Vera'a

    Open Access•Stefan Schnell, Danielle Barth•Language Variation and Change•2018

  • Expression of anaphoric subjects in Vera'a

    Open Access•Stefan Schnell, Danielle Barth•Language Variation and Change•2020

  • Languages Through the Looking Glass of BPE Compression

    Open Access•Ximena Gutierrez-Vasques, Christian Bentz et al.•Computational Linguistics•2023

  • The relationship between the morphological knowledge and L2 online processing of derivational words

    Open Access•Taiping Deng, Jiawei Shi et al.•International Journal of…•2017

  • Evidence for infixation after the first syllable

    Open Access•Jennifer Wilson, Jennifer Fisher Wilson et al.•Phonology•2014

  • The size of clitics and affixes

    Open Access•Tim Zingler, Phillip Rogers•Studies in Language•2026

  • Truth, person, and personal truth

    M Donohue, Bhojraj Gautam•Studies in Language•2019

  • The epistemization of person markers in reported speech

    Manuel Widmer, Marius Zemp•Studies in Language•2017

  • Variable index placement in Gutob from a typological perspective

    Open Access•Erika Just, Judith Voß•Studies in Language•2023

  • Partitioning the timeline

    Viveka Velupillai•Studies in Language•2016

  • Syntactic and semantic agreement in Eegimaa (Banjal)

    Serge Sagna•Studies in Language•2019

  • Documenting the acquisition of indigenous languages

    Open Access•Clifton Pye•Journal of Child Language•2021

  • Children's command of plural and possessive marking on Hebrew nouns

    Open Access•Rachel Schiff, Dorit Ravid et al.•Journal of Child Language•2011

  • Paradigmatic complexity metrics as signals of phylogenetic relatedness

    Open Access•Borja Herce, Balthasar Bickel•Diachronica•2025

  • Using phonotactics to reconstruct degrammaticalization

    Don Daniels•Diachronica•2019

  • The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent

    Open Access•René Schiering, Balthasar Bickel et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2010

  • Stem alternations in Kiranti and their implications for the morphology–phonology interface

    Open Access•Borja Herce•Journal of Linguistics•2020

  • Deconstructing notions of morphological ‘complexity’

    Open Access•Felicia Bisnath, Hannah Lutzenberger et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2025

  • The ergative and its differential marking in Mùwe Ké

    Open Access•Jon Archer•Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman…•2025

  • Whence subject-verb agreement? Investigating the role of topicality, accessibility, and frequency in Vera’a texts

    Open Access•Stefan Schnell•Linguistics•2018

  • The grammaticalization of object pronouns

    Open Access•Geoffrey Haig•Linguistics•2018

  • Multi-variate coding for possession

    Open Access•Natalia Chousou-Polydouri, David Inman et al.•Linguistics•2023

  • Matter borrowing, pattern borrowing and typological rarities in the Gran Chaco of South America

    Open Access•Luca Ciucci•Morphology•2020

  • Inflection and derivation as traditional comparative concepts

    Open Access•Martin Haspelmath•Linguistics•2024

  • On the Morphosyntax of Indigenous Languages of the Americas

    Federico Zúñiga, Fernando Zúñiga•International Journal of American…•2017

  • From Dichotomy to Divergence

    Open Access•Dorit Ravid, Rachel Schiff•Language Learning•2012

  • Cláusulas cosubordinadas en mazahua (otomangue)

    Open Access•Armando Mora-Bustos•LIAMES Línguas Indígenas Americanas•2025

  • Concordância verbal de número em Kaingáng

    Open Access•Wilmar Da Rocha D''Angeli, Wilmar Da Rocha D'Angeli•LIAMES Línguas Indígenas Americanas•2012

  • Prominence Hierarchies

    Open Access•Hunter Thompson Lockwood, Monica Macaulay•Language and Linguistics Compass•2012

  • On morphological borrowing

    Open Access•Francesco Gardani•Language and Linguistics Compass•2018

  • Tempo, aspecto e modo em Boróro

    Open Access•Adriana Maria Soares Viana•LIAMES Línguas Indígenas Americanas•2012

Unique citing works94
Citations per year2,47
Citation span1988 - 2026 (39)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 86

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae