Heraclitus

Bibliographic Data

ID23406342
AuthorsEdward Hussey (corresponding author)
Year1999
Pages88-112
Publication date1999-06-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueThe Cambridge companion to early Greek philosophy (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/ccol0521441226.005
OpenAlexW4237658211
ISBN9780521441223
LanguageEN
Citations received4

THE APPROACH TO HERACLITUS Heraclitus of Ephesus must have been active around 500 B.C. Nothing is known of the external events of his life; the later biographical reports are fiction. Of Heraclitus' book, around one hundred fragments survive. It seems to have consisted of a series of aphoristic statements without formal linkage. The style is unique. Heraclitus' carefully stylized and artfully varied prose ranges from plain statements in ordinary language to oracular utterances with poetical special effects in vocabulary, rhythm, and word arrangement. Many statements play with paradoxes or hover teasingly on the brink of self-contradiction. Many seem intended as pungently memorable aphorisms. (Translations in this chapter try to capture some of the ambiguities, where this is reasonably possible.) The meaning and purpose of Heraclitus7 book has always been found to be problematic, even by those who read it in its entirety. The Peripatetic Theophrastus (D.L. IX.6) diagnosed Heraclitus as “melancholic” (manic-depressive), on the grounds that he left some things half-finished, and contradicted himself; later Greeks named him “the obscure.” Certainly Heraclitus did not always aim at expository order and clarity as usually understood. What remains shows that he often was deliberately unclear. Like a riddle or an oracle, he practised a deliberate half-concealment of his meanings, goading the reader to participate in a game of hide-and-seek.

Art · Contradiction · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Nothing · Style (visual arts) · Vocabulary · Classical Antiquity Studies · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-HubLibgen