Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Council of Ariminum and Homoian Supremacy

Bibliographic Data

ID23406490
AuthorsDaniel H Williams (corresponding author)
Year1995
Pages11-37
Publication date1995-05-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueAmbrose of Milan and the end of the Nicene-Arian conflicts (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198264644.003.0002
OpenAlexW2498034160
ISBN9780198264644
LanguageEN

This chapter analyzes the events leading to the establishment of a Homoian identity that was crystallized through the successes of the council of Ariminum. It shows that the churches in the west were not unified theologically in an indebtedness to the Nicene creed as a general confessional standard. By the winter of ad 360 one can speak of what Gwatkin called the ‘Homoian supremacy’ in the west, though for only a very short time. Even before the death of Constantius (3 November 361), one is confronted with the fragmentary evidence of a mounting opposition to the recent successes of the Homoian bishops, a process that resulted in a hardening of theological affiliations. And by the beginning of the reign of Valentinian I, only three years later, the credal affirmations of the late 350s have formed into definable parties — Homoian and Neo-Nicene, inter alia — with distinct churches, liturgies, and literature. As the parties took shape, so did the controversy that produced them.

Political science · Classical Antiquity Studies · History

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae