The Soldier as Lethal Warrior and Cooperative Political Agent: On the Soldier's Ethical and Political Obligations toward the Indigenous Other
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS, USA |
ANO | 2012 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | Armed Forces and Society |
ISSN | 0095-327X |
E-ISSN | 1556-0848 |
EDITORA | Annual Reviews (United States) |
DOI | 10.1177/0095327x11418322 |
CITAÇÕES | 3 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
07de73edb89469a643e29b381b980e63
|
Resumo
An adequate configuration of the military ethic, which encompasses the U.S. Army's professional and ethical self-understanding, should integrate the soldier's ethicopolitical obligations toward the indigenous other; that is, the person who lives where soldiers are deployed. The argument first posits a distinction between cosmopolitan and patriotic configurations of the soldier's obligations. David Petraeus's counterinsurgency guidance typifies the former; Matthew Moten's configuration of the professional military ethic typifies the latter. Second, Hannah Arendt's distinction between Work and Action instructs that one does not 'build' a polity; political foundations are fugitive and unpredictable. Third, considering Arendt's theory and current missions, the soldier as a political agent cannot produce stability or build a nation with instrumental certitude; however, the soldier can foster conditions and intervene in ways to nudge circumstances toward a better state of affairs. Finally, military professionals should cultivate a cosmopolitan attitude informed by William Connolly's ethos of engagement to help them fulfill their obligations to the other.