Tibullan impersonation and Callimachean influence in the Messalla Panegyric ([Tib.] 3.7)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23409351 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Maltby (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Pages | 148-169 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Constructing Authors and Readers in the Appendices Vergiliana, Tibulliana, and Ouidiana (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oso/9780198864417.003.0010 |
| OpenAlex | W3094196680 |
| ISBN | 9780198864417 |
| Language | EN |
This chapter asks how a hexameter panegyric found its way into an elegiac collection by various authors that has come down to us as the Appendix Tibulliana . Peirano (2012) makes a good case for the poem being a Tibullan impersonation and this chapter takes the argument further, suggesting that some of the peculiarities of the panegyric are derived from its connection with Callimachean epinicion, also a feature of Tibullus 1.7. The similarity in the positioning of the Messalla Panegyric as seventh in its book, following a group of six love elegies, exactly parallels the position of Tibullus 1.7. The Callimachean features of both poems deserve further investigation; these throw light on the poem’s links with Catalepton 9 and the Laus Pisonis . In conclusion, it is suggested that the poem could have been deliberately placed seventh in the collection by its author, who may well have edited the whole book.
Argument (complex analysis) · Art · Elegiac · Elegy · Literature · Panegyric · Poetry · Byzantine Studies and History · Classical Antiquity Studies · Medicine · Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|