Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Amitai Etzioni
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
ANO 2016
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Armed Forces and Society
ISSN 0095-327X
E-ISSN 1556-0848
EDITORA SAGE Publications
DOI 10.1177/0095327x14548717
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 7be421d4d1ac849c21c9e143c9f0eabc

Resumo

In response to China's military modernization and growing anti-access/area denial capabilities, the US military has adopted an 'Air Sea Battle' (ASB) concept entailing extensive strikes on the Chinese mainland. ASB has been embraced at the Pentagon and increasingly affects procurement decisions. Critics argue that ASB creates grave escalation risks and may incite an expensive arms race. Less discussed, but also of serious concern, is that ASB was adopted with little to no civilian oversight, in a case of 'structural inattention.' This failure of civil–military relations derives from institutional factors such as the nature and composition of the White House staff, as well as from the administration's pragmatic rather than strategic approach to China. It has also been facilitated by 'subterranean factors' including the interests of influential military contractors and the military's own inclination toward conventional warfare.

Ferramentas