Byron and Twentieth-Century Popular Culture
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23412945 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ghislaine McDayter (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Pages | 130-154 |
| Publication date | 2007-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Palgrave Advances in Byron Studies (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan UK (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/9780230206106_7 |
| OpenAlex | W2490654090 |
| ISBN | 9780230206106 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 12 |
In Calvert’s bizarre but by no means unprecedented description of the younger generation of Romantic poets, we are encouraged to approach Byron’s corpus, unlike the ethereal bodies of his contemporaries, as we would a geological site: Byron’s poetry is a physical residue of his presence that has hardened and fossilized, leaving us a material object by which to understand him. And like any geological dig, it is assumed that the rock under our eyes is a faithful and undistorted record of a lost past. Somehow, it is argued, we still have access to the physical reality of Byron in ways that we do not to Keats or Shelley. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Art · Art history · Linguistics · Literature · Object (grammar) · Poetry · Romance · History · Philippine History and Culture · Philosophy · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
| Highly cited | No |
|---|