The exemplary past in Roman historiography and culture
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23413643 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew Roller, Matthew B Roller (0000-0002-8784-4112, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Pages | 214-230 |
| Publication date | 2009-09-24 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | The Cambridge companion to the Roman historians (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/ccol9780521854535.014 |
| OpenAlex | W2495319532 |
| ISBN | 9780521854535 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 25 |
The modern reader of any Roman text that concerns itself with the Roman past - principally, but not only, narrative historiography - is inevitably struck by the prominence accorded “great deeds” and the actors who perform them. It is a familiar feature of Roman historical consciousness that, at any given time, the past could be regarded as a storehouse of practices, orientations, and values - sometimes referred to as the mos maiorum , “the custom of the forebears” - that were embodied in celebrated actors and deeds, and through them were made manifest and accessible to later ages. These actors and deeds could be adduced as cognitive or ethical models to provide guidance and standards to later Romans as they contemplated actions of their own, or evaluated the actions of others. These paradigmatic actors and deeds from the past are my subject here, and I aim to examine the consequences, for historiography and other commemorative forms, of regarding the past as “exemplary” in this way. I begin by distinguishing the “exemplary” mode of confronting the past from the “historicist” modes that have characterized the academic discipline of history since the early nineteenth century. I then explore the ways exemplarity manifests itself in Roman culture generally (the broader context in which the specifically historiographical manifestations occur) by examining the case of Gaius Duilius, consul in 260 BCE, who was renowned for a naval victory over the Carthaginians. I conclude by considering to what extent, in Duilius' case and more generally, “historicist” elements can be identified alongside the “exemplary” ones in Roman historical consciousness.
Aesthetics · Archaeology · Art · Context (archaeology) · Historicism · Historiography · Literature · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Subject (documents) · Victory · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Archaeological Research and Protection · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · History · Law
Models from the Past in Roman Culture
Tacitus, Annals, 15.20-23, 33-45
Rome, China, and the Barbarians
The Oxford History of Classical Reception in English Literature
Exemplary Ethics in Ancient Rome
Symbolic mourning
Duilius, Gaius
Duilius, Gaius
Ambrose, Augustine, and the Pursuit of Greatness
Painting, Ethics, and Aesthetics in Rome
Political Thought
A historia magistra vitae e o pós-modernismo
Exemplary History
Morte e gênero em Sêneca
Usos do passado em Tito Lívio
Reading Roman Pride
The Gate of Horns
Seeing Marcellus in Aeneid 6
Tiberius aequatus Augusto
Expressing Contempt in Rome—Language, Rhetoric, and Critique
Cicero and Roman Education
Exemplary History and Arsacid Genealogy in Tacitus, Annals 6.31
You Must Change Your Life”
Textual Monuments
Primus Romanorum
| Citations per year | 1.79 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2024 (13) |
| Highly cited | No |