Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Privata hospitia, beneficia publica? Consul(ar)s, local elite and Roman rule in Italy

Bibliographic Data

ID23417337
AuthorsMichael P Fronda (corresponding author)
EditorsHans Beck (0000-0002-0319-1186), Antonio Duplá, Martin Jehne, Francisco Pina Polo (0000-0001-8708-6211)
Year2011
Pages232-256
Publication date2011-10-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueConsuls and Res Publica (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/cbo9780511736124.013
OpenAlexW1962942232
ISBN9780511736124
LanguageEN

Livy 42.1 preserves an anecdote that says a great deal about the interaction between Roman consuls (and consulars) and local Italian aristocrats. In 173, the consul Lucius Postumius Albinus departed for Campania to resolve a dispute over the boundaries between public and private lands, and along the way he stayed over at Praeneste. Before arriving, he had sent word ahead demanding that the local magistrates come out to greet him. He stipulated that he should be housed and entertained at public expense, and he further ordered the Praenestines to prepare pack animals for his trip to Campania. Livy claims that Postumius made these high-handed demands because he was angry at the Praenestines for failing to show him appropriate respect when previously, as a private citizen, he had gone to sacrifice at the temple of Fortuna. Livy condemns Postumius for abusing his consular authority and he concludes that the locals, who appear to have accepted Postumius’ demands without incident, must have acquiesced out of modesty or fear; Livy's assessment is not implausible. This episode highlights the tensions and the ambiguities inherent in the relationship between Rome and the allied communities in Italy during the republican period. On the one hand, the Italian allies were subject to Roman hegemony, and many had been forced into alliance with Rome as the result of military defeat. The occasional arrival of a Roman consul or any other high magistrate, especially one possessing imperium , demanding preferential treatment and public or private gestures of deference, must have reinforced this reality. Indeed, Postumius’ anger at his earlier treatment at Praeneste suggests that Roman aristocrats had grown to expect deferential treatment when they visited Italian communities even when not holding public office. On the other hand, Roman and local aristocratic families often shared close personal and familial bonds. In fact, in the same passage in which he describes the Postumius affair, Livy comments on how Roman senators and local aristocrats commonly enjoyed mutual hospitality ( hospitium ), with senators opening their homes to guests (members of the Italian elite) in whose houses they would in turn stay when outside of Rome. Moreover, this example demonstrates that it made good practical sense for local elites to forge strong personal bonds with members of the Roman elite and continue to reaffirm those bonds, since, as Postumius’ abusive behavior shows, failing to do so could have serious consequences.

Anecdote · Archaeology · Art · Elite · Political science · Sacrifice · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classical Studies and Legal History · History · Law

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae