Euripides’ Erechtheus and the Athenian Catalogue of Exploits
How a Tragic Plot Shaped the Funeral Oration
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23429871 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Johanna Hanink (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Pages | 319-338 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Athenian Funeral Oration (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/9781009413053.017 |
| OpenAlex | W4390720588 |
| ISBN | 9781009413053 |
| Language | EN |
Funeral orators came to rehearse four ‘standard’ myths. The classical Athenians believed that the earliest was the victory of their ancestors against an army that the Thracian Eumolpus had led into Attica. The widely held position is that these four mythical erga were a part of the genre from its beginning. Yet, this chapter firmly establishes that this position simply does not hold when it comes to the myth about Eumolpus. Indeed, the first funeral speech to mention it was only the one that Plato wrote soon after the end of the Corinthian War. Before this, there had existed an older myth about Erechtheus, an early Athenian king, and Eumolpus fighting each other. Importantly, however, this myth presented their fight as a civil war between Eleusis, a deme in Attica, and Athens. The new myth, which, by contrast, made Eumolpus and his army foreign invaders, first appeared in Erechtheus, which Euripides wrote at the end of the 420s. As Euripides regularly changed old myths or, simply, invented new ones, Hanink argues that the epitaphic exploit about Eumolpus was originally his invention.
Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Literature · Mythology · Plot (graphics) · Political science · Politics · Spanish Civil War · Victory · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|