Reading Gladiators’ Epitaphs and Rethinking Violence and Masculinity in The Roman Empire
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23437960 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Renata Senna Garraffoni (0000-0002-4745-8161, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Pages | 214-231 |
| Publication date | 2011-10-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Archaeology of Colonialism (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/cbo9780511920011.016 |
| OpenAlex | W1702633951 |
| ISBN | 9780511920011 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 20 |
Introduction Classical sources have been used to provide broad parallels and contrasts with the present. Although many types of archaeological and historical information are available about the Roman Empire, Hingley (2005) states that a core issue in modern scholarship is how to approach the relationship between power and identity. Since the sixteenth century, the Romans sometimes have been understood to be part of a shared European identity; conversely, at times the Romans were categorized as “others.” Roman violence and power have both attracted and repulsed scholars throughout the past two centuries, resulting in different interpretations of the Roman past. For example, the consequences of Roman imperialism have been understood at times as beneficial to native societies because of supposed material improvement and cultural “progress” experienced by native societies. The Roman system of domination, therefore, became an example of what a modern empire should be and consequently inspired colonialist policy during the end of nineteenth century into the beginning of twentieth, with the violence of the process seldom acknowledged (Hingley 1996, 2000, 2001, 2005, Shepherd, Chapter 17, this volume). In the 1970s, however, this perception of the Roman Empire began to be challenged. The so-called nativist approach, developed mainly by British scholars, pointed out the importance of material culture in the study of local communities. This new scholarship balanced the record of the elite with an awareness of cultural negotiation in different areas of the empire (Delgado and Ferrer, Chapter 12, this volume). This approach emphasizes that native people were not only “assimilated” into the Roman order but also participated in the creation of new orders.
Aesthetics · Ancient history · Art · Empire · Identity (music) · Literature · Masculinity · Parallels · Political science · Power (physics) · Reading (process) · Roman Empire · Scholarship · Sociology · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Gender Studies · History · Law
Roman imperialism
Death and Disease in the Ancient City
Cultural Identity in the Roman Empire
Historical Archaeology
Roman Theater and Society
Historians and Archaeologists
Fighting for Identity
The Philosopher and the Gladiator
Female Gladiators in Imperial Rome
Gender and Archaeology
La gladiature en Occident. Des origines à la mort de Domitien
Tombstones and Roman Family Relations in the Principate
Emperors and Gladiators
The Sorrows of the Ancient Romans
Globalizing Roman Culture
The Epigraphic Habit in the Roman Empire
Contributions to Feminism in Archaeology
Gladiadores na Roma Antiga
| Highly cited | No |
|---|