Dementia and the Limits to Life: Anthropological Sensibilities, STS Interferences, and Possibilities for Action in Care
Dados Bibliográficos
| AUTOR(ES) | |
|---|---|
| AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | Department of Nursing and Health Care, Diakonhjemmet University College, Oslo, Norway, |
| ANO | 2011 |
| TIPO | Artigo |
| PERIÓDICO | Science Technology and Human Values |
| ISSN | 0162-2439 |
| E-ISSN | 1552-8251 |
| EDITORA | Annual Reviews (United States) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0162243910396349 |
| CITAÇÕES | 15 |
| ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
| MD5 |
c2e1d415fdbacbea1ebb221df19ae2c7
|
Resumo
It is often assumed that it was the alliance between patient associations and neuroscience, which originally made dementia a matter for intervention. In parallel ways, science and technology studies (STS) often attributes the power to define and act upon matters of life to biomedicine and science. The concern here is that the science centrism of STS contributes to the dominance of science and biomedicine by granting these analytical privileges. As a result, alternative modes of acting, for instance in care, are disarticulated and made absent. This article mobilizes the sensibilities of anthropology to difference and draws upon excerpts of data from fieldwork in dementia care to show this and argue that there are different practices that act upon life and its limits; that these enact different versions of life and dementia; and that they matter because they shape how people are cared for and live and die with dementia.