Divergent Paradigms of European Agro-Food Innovation
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | The Open University |
ANO | 2013 |
TIPO | Artigo |
PERIÓDICO | Science Technology and Human Values |
ISSN | 0162-2439 |
E-ISSN | 1552-8251 |
EDITORA | Annual Reviews (United States) |
DOI | 10.1177/0162243912438143 |
CITAÇÕES | 2 |
ADICIONADO EM | 2025-08-18 |
MD5 |
d0f46036384271ee4a9c3635b45e0b92
|
Resumo
The Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy (KBBE) has gained prominence as an agricultural R&D agenda of the European Union. Specific research policies are justified as necessary to create a KBBE for societal progress. Playing the role of a master narrative, the KBBE attracts rival visions; each favours a different diagnosis of unsustainable agriculture and its remedies in agro-food innovation. Each vision links a technoscientific paradigm with a quality paradigm: the dominant life sciences vision combines converging technologies with decomposability, while a marginal one combines agro-ecology with integral product integrity. From these divergent visions, rival stakeholder networks contend for influence over research policies and priorities, especially within the Framework Programme 7 (FP7) on Food, Agriculture, Fisheries and Biotechnology (FAFB), which has aimed to promote a Knowledge-Based Bio-Economy. Although the FAFB programme has favoured a life sciences vision, agro-ecological approaches have gained a presence, thus overcoming their general lock-out from agricultural research agendas. In their own way, each rival paradigm emphasises the need for collective systems to gather information for linking producers with users, as a rationale for the public sector to fund distinctive research priorities.