Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) James M. Nyce , Minna Räsänen
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Department of Anthropology, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USA, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden
ANO 2013
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Science Technology and Human Values
ISSN 0162-2439
E-ISSN 1552-8251
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/0162243913480049
CITAÇÕES 6
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 d0886b080ea325b13376d4b8d879f796

Resumo

This article looks at some common assumptions and associated work practices within a military intelligence community. There intelligence practitioners use the term 'raw data' as a common sense category, as a word that describes information they want or have gained access to. The practical and organizational processes that inform the construction of the term raw data are unpacked here. Examples presented are based on interviews, field observations, and document reviews. Theoretical descriptions and models of work, for example, the intelligence cycle, construction, and the use of computer databases, assume that work in this community starts with raw data. However, this data has already been (prior) processed by the work practices, political, practical, and other decisions even before data collection occurs. The technology and attendant categories and practices instrumentalize a certain world view. The model used frames not just the collection and organization of the institution's knowledge but those categories that inform how this institution organizes, legitimizes, and enacts its work, data, and knowledge. Given the kinds of opponents nations have to face today, intelligence practitioners and those who study their work have to understand practice, action, and contexts often quite different from ones own.

Ferramentas