Conclusion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23444629 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Karen J Alter (0000-0001-9508-8938), Laurence R Helfer, Mikael Rask Madsen (0000-0002-1473-6727) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Publication date | 2018-09-20 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | International Court Authority (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oso/9780198795582.003.0023 |
| OpenAlex | W4247476404 |
| ISBN | 9780198795582 |
| Language | EN |
This concluding chapter returns to the conjectures developed in Chapter 2, extracting insights from the book’s empirical chapters to explore how context shapes the authority of ICs. While several of the conjectures were confirmed, others were not. We focus in particular on the limited impact of IC design features, the distinctive challenges faced by international criminal tribunals, and by ICs created during the post-Cold War era. The final section revisits the distinction between IC authority and IC power. We explain why IC authority is likely to remain fragile, and we revisit our claim that authority can not only increase but also stagnate or diminish over time.
Advertising · Archaeology · Business · Cold war · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Power (physics) · Section (typography) · Sociology · Corruption and Economic Development · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · History · Law · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |