Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Incidental Question

Bibliographic Data

ID23456238
AuthorsJ J Fawcett (University of Nottingham), J M Carruthers (University of Glasgow)
EditorsSir Peter North (Former Principal of Jesus College, Oxford, and Vice-Chancellor of Oxford University)
Year2008
Pages51-56
Publication date2008-09-04
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenuePrivate International Law (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/law/9780199284252.003.0004
OpenAlexW4401780780
ISBN9780199284252
LanguageEN

A case involving private international law may place a subsidiary issue, as well as a main question, before the court. Once the relevant choice of law rule has been applied and the law to govern the main issue thereby determined, a further choice of law rule may be required to answer the subsidiary question affecting the main issue. This problem may be illustrated as follows. Suppose that W claims rights of intestate succession to H’s immovables in Italy. According to English rules of private international law, this falls to be determined by Italian law as the law of the situs.1 Assume further that, under English conflict rules, W is recognised as H’s widow, but not under Italian rules, because, for instance, Italian law does not recognise H’s divorce from his first wife. The main problem, whether W can succeed to H’s estate, is clearly determinable by Italian law, but must the subsidiary problem of the validity of the marriage also be referred to that law?

Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies · Legal case studies and regulations · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae