Conclusion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23456744 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Prathama Benerjee (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Pages | 236-248 |
| Publication date | 2006-07-27 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Politics of Time (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195681567.003.0007 |
| OpenAlex | W4254601096 |
| ISBN | 9780195681567 |
| Language | EN |
This chapter tries to clarify the unfinished nature of both the work of colonial modernity and its critique. As the nation seeks to ‘liberalize’ its economy and mirror the trajectory of global capital, it claims the purity and righteousness of cultural conservatism. It is noted that by the 1930s, the colonized, by way of reclaiming ‘modern’ knowledge-disciplines from the colonizer, hinted at his/her own marginality and lateness in the present. The temporality of re-presentation neutralizes the temporality of encounter, and therefore the temporality of collective practice. Peoples like the Santals became ‘primitive’ in colonial modernity not only because of colonial strategies of other-ing but also because the colonized themselves tried to assume the representational location necessary for modern monetary and epistemological rationalities. Social practices need not necessarily generate others in any epistemological sense.
Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies · Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies · Globalization and political ideologies · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|