Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Conclusion

Bibliographic Data

ID23456744
AuthorsPrathama Benerjee (corresponding author)
Year2006
Pages236-248
Publication date2006-07-27
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenuePolitics of Time (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195681567.003.0007
OpenAlexW4254601096
ISBN9780195681567
LanguageEN

This chapter tries to clarify the unfinished nature of both the work of colonial modernity and its critique. As the nation seeks to ‘liberalize’ its economy and mirror the trajectory of global capital, it claims the purity and righteousness of cultural conservatism. It is noted that by the 1930s, the colonized, by way of reclaiming ‘modern’ knowledge-disciplines from the colonizer, hinted at his/her own marginality and lateness in the present. The temporality of re-presentation neutralizes the temporality of encounter, and therefore the temporality of collective practice. Peoples like the Santals became ‘primitive’ in colonial modernity not only because of colonial strategies of other-ing but also because the colonized themselves tried to assume the representational location necessary for modern monetary and epistemological rationalities. Social practices need not necessarily generate others in any epistemological sense.

Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies · Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies · Globalization and political ideologies · Philosophy

Highly citedNo
Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae