Historical Social Network Analysis
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 23458656 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Charles Wetherell (autor de correspondencia) |
| Editores | Larry J Griffin, Marcel Van Der Linden |
| Año | 2010 |
| Páginas | 125-144 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2010-08-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | CHAPTER |
| Revista | New Methods for Social History (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editorial | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/cbo9780511563874.007 |
| OpenAlex | W1273620217 |
| ISBN | 9780511563874 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
INTRODUCTION In the past two decades, social network analysis (SNA) has become a major analytical paradigm in sociology and now occupies a strategic place in disciplinary debates on a wide variety of issues. Historians, however, have been slow to adopt the approach for at least three reasons. First, the conceptual orientation of sociologists practicing historical social network analysis (HSNA) remains unfamiliar to the majority of professional historians. Just when SNA was maturing in the late 1980s and 1990s, the interdisciplinary interest in social science theory among historians, so characteristic of the 1970s and early 1980s, began to wane. The subsequent turn toward postmodernist thinking in history left the profession increasingly uninformed about both classical and contemporary social theory. Second, those quantitatively-oriented historians who might be predisposed to use SNA's specialized statistical methods constitute less than a quarter of the profession today, thus the risk of SNA finding its way into mainstream historical scholarship is low to start. Third, SNA's data requirements are formidable. SNA demands evidence of social interaction among all members of a social system for a variety of behaviors, and thus necessitates a broad range of high-quality records for the place, time and activities being studied. Because historians are plagued by an incomplete historical record and imperfect understandings of past social relations, HSNA remains an inherently problematic enterprise. Yet despite conceptual, methodological and evidentiary obstacles, SNA possesses real potential for historical analysis. This essay does three things. First, it reviews the essential tenets of SNA as a method of social analysis. Second, it provides a brief overview of the underlying historical vision guiding SNA.
Comparative historical research · Discipline · Epistemology · Mainstream · Political science · Scholarship · Social capital · Social network analysis · Social science · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics) · Law · Philippine History and Culture
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,08 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2002 - 2008 (7) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |