Bourdieu’s Uneven Influence on Anglophone Canadian Sociology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23459199 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Mclevey (0000-0002-8512-1308, University of Waterloo), Allyson Stokes (University of Waterloo), Amelia Howard (University of Waterloo) |
| Editors | Thomas Medvetz (0000-0003-2456-6765), Jeffrey J Sallaz (0000-0001-5821-873X) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Publication date | 2018-04-05 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Oxford Handbook of Pierre Bourdieu (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199357192.013.4 |
| OpenAlex | W2796215801 |
| ISBN | 9780199357192 |
| Language | EN |
Pierre Bourdieu is one of the most influential and widely cited figures in anglophone Canadian sociology. Since the first decade of the twenty-first century, in particular, his theories have guided research in areas such as the sociology of culture, education, social theory, social networks, and social capital. This chapter presents a content analysis of journal articles to better understand Bourdieu’s influence on anglophone Canadian sociology. Many citations to Bourdieu are ritualistic and occasionally are characterized by misreadings. Furthermore, interpretations and applications of Bourdieu’s ideas have been limited by a methodological division of labor. Quantitative research has primarily been concerned with cultural and social capital, with qualitative and historical research placing more emphasis on habitus and fields. The authors suggest several ways to expand the engagement with Bourdieu’s work, and to move beyond the current methodological division of labor.
Cultural capital · Division of labour · Epistemology · Habitus · Political science · Social capital · Social science · Sociology · Law · Social and Cultural Dynamics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|