Rococo Enlightenment? Berlin, Hamann, and Diderot
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23459790 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marian Hobson (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Pages | 99-112 |
| Publication date | 2016-10-20 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Isaiah Berlin and the Enlightenment (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783930.003.0008 |
| OpenAlex | W2551171163 |
| ISBN | 9780198783930 |
| Language | EN |
Criticisms of the Enlightenment tend to neglect thought which is undoubtedly of the Enlightenment but which doesn’t fit in with what they have constructed. This tendency particularly affects Diderot: the range of his writings considered is almost always narrowed down, the problems of irony and tone they pose are often ignored. On a larger scale, the rococo is passed over, as if in embarrassment. Some of Diderot’s works can plausibly described be as ‘rococo’ and the paper tries to assess that term in relation to him. Moreover, it argues that something similar might be said of Hamann, whose interest in Diderot is sustained, in spite of the latter’s non-belief. The paper suggests that an abiding thread in the culture of the period is an often joking scepticism, which in both Diderot and Hamann is designed to create discomfort in the reader.
Art · Art history · Enlightenment · Literature · Theology · Historical and Literary Analyses · Historical and Literary Studies · Philosophy · Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought
| Highly cited | No |
|---|