Myth into muthos

Bibliographic Data

ID23476663
AuthorsPeter Burian (corresponding author)
Year1997
Pages178-208
Publication date1997-10-02
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueThe Cambridge companion to Greek tragedy (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/ccol0521412455.008
OpenAlexW2490675231
ISBN9780521412452
LanguageHE
Citations received22

TRAGEDY AS REPETITION AND INNOVATION Tragedie is to seyn a certyn storie as olde bookes maken us memorie of hym that stood in greet prosperitee and is yfallen out of heigh degree into miserie, and endeth ureccedly In the Middle Ages, when tragedy as an enactment on stage had been all but forgotten, Chaucer still knew the right shape for a tragic tale. In such a scheme, only the names need be changed, for the form of the tale - and its meaning - always remain the same. Of course, Chaucer's definition is far too restrictive to describe the shapes that Greek tragic plots actually took, but even the much more knowing and differentiated analysis in Aristotle's Poetics, from which Chaucer's notion of tragedy ultimately derives, appears to certify only some of the plots used by the tragedians as properly tragic. Still, it is clear that in practice not any subject was a tragic subject, not any plot-shape suitable to the requirements of the tragic stage. First, the plots of Greek tragedies were drawn largely from a limited repertoire of legends, the great cycles in which the Greeks came to terms with their own past - the stories of 'a few families', as Aristotle says, above all the legendary histories of Troy and Thebes.

Art · Literature · Mythology · Classical Antiquity Studies

Tools

Open DOISci-HubLibgen