Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Summary of Volume I

Bibliographic Data

ID23480334
AuthorsBeatrice Heuser (0000-0002-2199-1857, University of Glasgow), Isabelle Duyvesteyn (0000-0003-3468-4511, Leiden University)
Year2024
Pages528-565
Publication date2024-12-31
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueCambridge History of Strategy (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/9781108788090.028
OpenAlexW4406076236
ISBN9781108788090
LanguageEN
References cited12

Warfare did not evolve in a linear fashion. This is most obvious on the physical level: the weapons and armies of polities across time and space have fluctuated in sophistication, so that early European medieval armies had more in common with ancient Israelite or Greek contingents than with the Roman war machinery, and, up to the nineteenth century or even the twentieth, raiding warfare in some parts of Africa or the islands of south-east Asia was akin to patterns of pre-Columbian warfare in the Americas, prehistoric warfare in Europe and ghazis and booty expeditions in Europe and around the Mediterranean. Where warfare’s aims went beyond mere raiding, for much of world history, the paucity or even absence of relevant sources has made it difficult to reconstruct political–strategic aims. We also encounter vast varieties conditioned in part by hard factors such as climate, geography and resources. We have encountered and possibly not always avoided the danger of squeezing cultural differences into a Procrustean bed of Western concepts and languages. Yet some striking patterns have emerged. Not only Indo-European cultures, but also Mongols and Chinese, came up with a strategic aim of establishing a universal monarchy, or defending against the imposition of such an overlordship. The forming of alliances for common strategic purposes and the defence of allies or clients is another widespread pattern, strategic co-operation counterbalancing long-term hostilities. The distinction between client states and allies was often blurred. Non-kinetic tools of strategy were also employed widely, from giving gifts, to tribute payments (again a distinction often difficult to make), to marriages to confirm peace treaties or cement alliances. And most cultures seem to have had some rules or code of honour with regard to the conduct of war which in many contexts imposed limits on the pursuit of strategic aims.

Physics · Thermodynamics · Volume (thermodynamics) · Eurasian Exchange Networks · History

  • The Asian Military Revolution

    Open Access•Peter Lorge, Peter A Lorge•Asian Military Revolution•2008

  • A Companion to the Achaemenid Persian Empire

    Open Access•Bruno Jacobs, Robert Rollinger•Companion to the Achaemenid…•2021

  • The Evolution of Strategy

    Open Access•Beatrice Heuser•Evolution of Strategy•2010

  • Marriage and divorce law in Pre-Islamic Persia. Legal status of the Sassanid’ woman (224–651 AD)

    Open Access•Katarzyna Maksymiuk, Martina Topić•Cogent Arts and Humanities•2019

  • European Warfare, 1350–1750

    Open Access•Kelly Devries, Steven Gunn et al.•European Warfare, 1350-1750•2010

  • The Russian Empire 1450-1801

    Nancy Shields Kollmann•The Russian Empire 1450-1801•2017

  • De-Constructing the French Wars

    Charles J Esdaile•Journal of Strategic Studies•2008

  • Climate Change, Mass Migration and the Military Response

    Open Access•Paul J Smith•Orbis•2007

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae