Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Style and Content in E-Mails and Letters to Male and Female Friends

Bibliographic Data

ID2350101
AuthorsAnn Colley (University of Leicester), Zazie Todd (University of Leeds), Matthew Bland (0000-0002-7038-1879), Michael E Holmes, Michael Holmes (0000-0003-1067-5282), Nuzibun Khanom, Hannah Pike (University of Leicester)
Year2004
Volume23
Issue3
Pages369-378
Publication date2004-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Language and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0261-927X • E-ISSN: 1552-6526
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0261927x04266812
OpenAlexW2090160452
LanguageEN
Citations received29
References cited13

This study examined gender differences in the style and content of e-mails and letters sent to friends on the topic of how time had been spent in the previous summer. Gender differences were found in both style and content supporting previous findings that female communication is more relational and expressive than that of males and focuses more upon personal and domestic topics. Women used the less formal stylistic conventions of e-mails to signal excitability in different ways to their male and female friends, whereas men ended their communications in a more relational way to their female than their male friends, and the nature of this difference varied according to the type of communication used

Content analysis · Developmental psychology · Significant difference · Sociology · Digital Communication and Language · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · History · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Social Gender Construction in Political Context

    Open Access•Ruonan Wang, Wang Ruonan et al.•Linguistics and Literature Studies•2020

  • Gender Analysis of Writing E-Mails Received from Graduate Students at Saudi Universities

    Open Access•Noorah A Almohaimeed•International Journal of English…•2022

  • Cross-Cultural Differences in Strategies of Peer Persuasion of Hebrew-Speaking and Arabic-Speaking Children

    Rachel Karniol•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2020

  • Different Gender, Different Arabic? The Case of Israel

    Open Access•Torkel Lindquist•Acta Orientalia Academiae…•1970

  • Nice to meet you.(!) Gendered norms in punctuation usage

    Open Access•Yidan Yin, Gil Appel et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2025

  • The impact of visualization and verbalization techniques on vocabulary learning of Iranian high school EFL learners

    Open Access•Reza Ghaedi, Mohsen Shahrokhi•Ampersand•2016

  • La construcción discursiva en WhatsApp

    Open Access•Marina González Sanz•Círculo de lingüística aplicada a…•2024

  • Dialogic analysis of government social media communication

    Open Access•Ruth Page, Sten Hansson•Discourse Context & Media•2024

  • Exploring variations in using emojis in digital communication in the UAE

    Nada Alzara, Noha Mellor•Journal of Arab & Muslim Media…•2024

  • Young adults and their digitally extended selves

    Open Access•Rajendra Nargundkar, Rajendra V Nargundkar et al.•Journal of Public Affairs•2020

  • Cultural Cues in Students' Computer-Mediated Communication

    Open Access•Miriam Hansen, Sabine Fabriz et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2015

  • Organizational Norm Congruency and Interpersonal Familiarity in E-Mail

    Open Access•Keri K Stephens, Renee L Cowan et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2011

  • Socio-pragmatic influence on opening salutation and closing valediction of British workplace email

    Open Access•Jamie Mckeown, Qilin Zhang•Journal of Pragmatics•2015

  • What Research Has to Say About Gender-Linked Differences in CMC and Does Elementary School Children’s E-mail Use Fit This Picture

    Open Access•Hans van der Meij•Sex Roles•2007

  • Who Benefits from Pennebaker’s Expressive Writing? More Research Recommendations

    Open Access•Lisa T Stickney•Sex Roles•2010

  • Communication Using Camera Phones Among Young Men and Women

    Open Access•Ann Colley, Zazie Todd et al.•Sex Roles•2010

  • Gender and Text Messaging in an Iranian Context

    Open Access•Neda Gohardehi, Amer Gheitury•Iranian Studies•2014

  • Metaphor Production in Online Conversation

    Karen A Hussey, Albert N Katz•Discourse Processes•2006

  • Gender Differences in Language Use

    Matthew L Newman, Carla J Groom et al.•Discourse Processes•2008

  • Standpoint in Political Blogs

    Anne Johnston, Barbara Friedman et al.•Women s Studies•2011

  • Gendered Language in Interactive Discourse

    Open Access•Karen A Hussey, Albert N Katz et al.•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2015

  • Gender and mobile phones in cross-national context

    Open Access•Naomi S Baron, Elise M Campbell•Language Sciences•2012

  • Corpus-based Critical Translation Studies

    Open Access•Kaibao Hu, Xiaoqian Li•Meta Journal des traducteurs•2019

  • Desirable and undesirable disagreements

    Open Access•Esty Teomim Ben-Menachem, Zohar Livnat•Journal of Pragmatics•2018

  • Dear Professor

    Open Access•Aimee C Knupsky, Aimee Knupsky et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2011

  • The Medium Makes a Difference

    Open Access•Annie B Fox, Danuta Bukatko et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2007

  • Intimate Partner Violence

    Open Access•Kirsten Robertson, Tamar Murachver•Journal of Language and Social…•2006

  • Explaining Gender-Based Language Use

    Open Access•N A Palomares•Human Communication Research•2008

  • Person-Centered Emotional Support and Gender Attributions in Computer-Mediated Communication

    Open Access•Erin L Spottswood, Joseph B Walther et al.•Human Communication Research•2013

  • Contexts of Accommodation

    Open Access•Howard Giles, Justine Coupland et al.•Contexts of Accommodation•1991

  • Interpersonal Adaptation

    Open Access•Judee K Burgoon, Lesa A Stern et al.•Interpersonal Adaptation•1995

  • Accommodation theory

    Open Access•H Giles, Nikolas Coupland et al.•Contexts of Accommodation•1991

  • You Just Don't Understand

    Deborah Tannen•You Just Don't Understand•1991

  • Gender-Typical Style in Written Language

    D L Rubin, Kathryn Greene•Research in the Teaching of English•1992

  • Close friendship in adulthood

    Open Access•Elizabeth Aries, Elizabeth J Aries et al.•Sex Roles•1983

  • The sounds of social life

    Matthias R Mehl, Dominic Siracusa et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • Letters by phone or speech by other means

    Open Access•Naomi S Baron•Language & Communication•1998

  • From bonding to biting

    Open Access•Diana Boxer, Florencia Cortés-Conde•Journal of Pragmatics•1997

  • Gender-Preferential Language Use in Spouse and Stranger Interaction

    Open Access•Mary Anne Fitzpatrick, Anthony Mulac et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•1995

  • Enacting Gender Identity in Written Discourse

    Open Access•Laura L Winn, D L Rubin•Journal of Language and Social…•2001

  • Gender-Linked Differences in the Style and Content of E-Mails to Friends

    Open Access•Ann Colley, Zazie Todd•Journal of Language and Social…•2002

Unique citing works29
Citations per year0,52
Citation span1970 - 2025 (56)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 25

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae