Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Jessica Mange , Nadia Lepastourel , Patrice Georget
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) University of Caen, Caen, France, LAUREPS-CRPCC, University of Rennes, Rennes, France,, LAUREPS-CRPCC, University of Rennes, Rennes, France, Laboratoire NIMEC, IAE, University of Caen, Caen, France
ANO 2009
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Journal of Language and Social Psychology
ISSN 0261-927X
E-ISSN 1552-6526
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/0261927x09341956
CITAÇÕES 3
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 abe871aa14907e3205a1fad5d8d87e98

Resumo

This research deals with the interplay between language use and social identity. Social lexical markers used by two leaders of two opposed groups (French and American presidents) on the Second Gulf War were identified. Experimental texts were constructed on this basis and were read by French participants. The authors compared two types of social identity activation, either indirect (in-group vs. out-group lexical markers) or direct (in-group vs. neutral priming). Attitude and intergroup perception were measured on three groups (French, American, and Iraqi). Whereas no effect of direct activation was observed, results notably showed that using out-group marker leads participants to emphasize their in-group attitude, whereas an in-group marker leads them to 'open-up' toward out-group attitude. Besides, an interesting in-group bias was evidenced despite the use of negatives outcomes and the three groups' evaluation. Potential applications for intergroup communication are discussed and theoretical and practical elaborations are proposed.

Ferramentas