Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) C. Carlson , E.A. Lewis , Lyn M. Van Swol , Andrew Prahl , Miranda R. Kolb
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA, USA, University of Wisconsin–Madison, WI, USA
ANO 2016
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Journal of Language and Social Psychology
ISSN 0261-927X
E-ISSN 1552-6526
EDITORA Annual Reviews (United States)
DOI 10.1177/0261927x16629788
CITAÇÕES 3
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 9a304b292cfb0dcf41f77114e325c08c

Resumo

Using the linguistic software Linguistic Inquiry Word Count, we analyzed transcripts of group discussions of whether the words 'under God' should be in the Pledge of Allegiance. We hypothesized that members with an extreme opinion would use less complex language and more you pronouns than other members. Furthermore, extreme members would have less influence when they used you pronouns or more complex language consistent with the illusion of understanding. Extreme members were more confident and perceived themselves as more knowledgeable, but they did not use less complex language than other members. When extreme members did use complex language, they were less influential. Extreme members used more you pronouns and use of you pronouns reduced their influence in the group. Groups containing at least one extreme member had a much lower level of complexity in their discourse than groups without extreme members. Results are situated within research in integrative complexity, illusion of understanding, and attitude extremity.

Ferramentas